Telecare for Diabetes, CHF or COPD: Effect on Quality of Life, Hospital Use and Costs. A Randomised Controlled Trial and Qualitative Evaluation

Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess the effect of telecare on health related quality of life, self-care, hospital use, costs and the experiences of patients, informal carers and health care professionals.MethodsPatients were randomly assigned either to usual care or to additionally entering their data into a commercially-available electronic device that uploaded data once a day to a nurse-led monitoring station. Patients had congestive heart failure (Site A), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Site B), or any long-term condition, mostly diabetes (Site C). Site C contributed only intervention patients – they considered a usual care option to be unethical. The study took place in New Zealand between September 2010 and February 2012, and lasted 3 to 6 months for each patient. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (SF36). Data on experiences were collected by individual and group interviews and by questionnaire.ResultsThere were 171 patients (98 intervention, 73 control). Quality of life, self-efficacy and disease-specific measures did not change significantly, while anxiety and depression both decreased significantly with the intervention. Hospital admissions, days in hospital, emergency department visits, outpatient visits and costs did not differ significantly between the groups. Patients at all sites were universally positive. Many felt safer and more cared-for, and said that they and their family had learned more about managing their condition. Staff could all see potential benefits of telecare, and, after some initial technical problems, many staff felt that telecare enabled them to effectively monitor more patients.ConclusionsStrongly positive patient and staff experiences and attitudes complement and contrast with small or non-significant quantitative changes. Telecare led to patients and families taking a more active role in self-management. It is likely that subgroups of patients benefitted in ways that were not measured or visible within the quantitative data, especially feelings of safety and being cared-for.Trial RegistrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000269033

The effectiveness of telemedicine in the management of chronic heart disease – a systematic review

“…4,12,16,20–22 Also, five out of 20 articles (25%) reported a decrease in the length of hospital stay due to longer follow-up periods, and this accounted for 8% of all occurrences of attributes. 4,8,9,18,19 …”

The impact of a point-of-care testing device on CVD risk assessment completion in New Zealand primary-care practice: A cluster randomised controlled trial and qualitative investigation

“…[25,42] Introducing a POC device into practice is a complex intervention and as such poses major challenges to the RCT design as it is largely determined by human agency. [43] It could be argued that this multifaceted intervention may have been better if we provided more training and support to embed such a tool into practice workflow.…”

Living with asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: Using technology to support self-management – An overview

“…However, qualitative studies report that patients are mostly positive about their experiences, reporting that they felt safer and that they had learned more about their condition, and staff felt that the improved knowledge could be a useful long-term benefit. 81 Earlier qualitative work had also suggested that interacting with a telehealth intervention and receiving feedback from the health professional can increase satisfaction in relation to factors such as continuity of care, understanding of symptom variability and encouragement of self-management behaviour. 82 While participants were mostly positive about their role in telemonitoring, several were glad to hand their devices back at the end of this short (3-6 month) study, stating that they were getting bored using it everyday.…”