2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots 2014
DOI: 10.1109/humanoids.2014.7041465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tele-manipulation with a humanoid robot under autonomous joint impedance regulation and vibrotactile balancing feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first online retargeting works were for the majority related exclusively to upper body movements [15], [16], [17]. Frequently, the retargeting of the upper-body joints, which is important for manipulation, is done independently from the one of the legs, crucial for balancing and locomotion [10], [18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first online retargeting works were for the majority related exclusively to upper body movements [15], [16], [17]. Frequently, the retargeting of the upper-body joints, which is important for manipulation, is done independently from the one of the legs, crucial for balancing and locomotion [10], [18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two robotic arms have been integrated to the framework: the humanoid robot COMAN in the one hand, and on the other, the KUKA LWR manipulator. While the Cartesian controller of KUKA could be used straightforwardly, with COMAN a second controller layer has been implemented, as described in Brygo et al (2014), to derive through inverse kinematics the arm’s joints position trajectory from the robot’s wrist 6D position trajectory reference.…”
Section: Experimental Assessment Of the Framework Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By modulating these dynamic properties, humans can adapt their manipulation tactic to the task at hand. Examples are increasing limb compliance in order to carefully handle delicate objects or decreasing limb compliance to reject disturbing forces ( [1], [3], [8], [13], [14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delayed reaction negatively influences the projection of the dynamic properties of the human arm on the robotic manipulator. Human dexterity is (partly) lost in a telerobotics system with communication delays and this can lead to reduced task performance and increased interaction forces between the robot and the remote environment ( [1], [3], [14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%