2018
DOI: 10.2144/btn-2018-0105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TEG-Seq: An Ion Torrent-Adapted NGS Workflow for in Cellulo Mapping of CRISPR Specificity

Abstract: GUIDE-seq was developed to detect CRISPR/Cas9 off-target. However, as originally reported, it was associated with a high level of nonspecific amplification. In an attempt to improve it, we developed target-enriched GUIDE-seq (TEG-seq). The sensitivity level reached 0.1-10 reads-per-million  depending on the NGS platform used, which was equivalent to 0.0002-1% measured by Targeted Amplicon-seq. Application of TEG-seq was demonstrated for the evaluation of various Cas9/gRNA configurations, which suggests deliver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seventy-nine bioinformatically-predicted off-target sites for gRNA #1-#5 were evaluated by Targeted Amplicon-Seq, and no off-target activity was detected at any of the predicted sites for any of the gRNAs ( online supplemental table S5 ). TEG-seq 12 was used to further evaluate off-target activity throughout the genome for gRNA #3 and gRNA #4. Three potential off-target sites were identified for gRNA #3, and five potential off-target sites were identified for gRNA #4 ( online supplemental figure S2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seventy-nine bioinformatically-predicted off-target sites for gRNA #1-#5 were evaluated by Targeted Amplicon-Seq, and no off-target activity was detected at any of the predicted sites for any of the gRNAs ( online supplemental table S5 ). TEG-seq 12 was used to further evaluate off-target activity throughout the genome for gRNA #3 and gRNA #4. Three potential off-target sites were identified for gRNA #3, and five potential off-target sites were identified for gRNA #4 ( online supplemental figure S2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, target-enriched GUIDE-seq (TEG-seq) 12 was used for genome-wide detection of off-target cleavage using gRNAs #3 and #4. For TEG-seq analysis, TIL were transfected with Cas9 RNP complexes with the addition of 20 pmol double stranded DNA tag to integrate into double strand break locations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For emerging of new data experimentally verified, firstly, we collected off-target sequences as well as their sgRNAs from in vitro [8]- [10], [22], [23] and cell-based genomewide assays [11]- [13], [24], among these assays, 3 of them contain PCR validation experiments [8], [22], [23]. As we hypothesized that the in vitro and cell-based assays may not be the reliable off-target data sources due to the differences in setting the environments between them and PCR assays, we further split the off-targets to two types.…”
Section: A Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro methods can detect off-target sites with low mutation frequency, for example, Kim et al introduced Digenome-seq to profile off-target sites on whole genome sequencing [8], Tsai et al developed CIRCLE-seq by reducing random reads in Digenome-seq [9], and Cameron et al presented SITE-seq by enriching and tagging Cas9 cleavage sites in Digenome-seq [10]. Additionally, cell-based methods can identify the mutation in certain cell types and conditions, for instances, GUIDE-seq is proposed to find off-target sites by tagging DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) with small double-stranded oligonucleotides [11], BLISS is developed to label the DSBs directly [12], and TEGseq is presented to enrich the target in GUIDE-seq [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of CRISPR modification on TIL expansion and TCR clonal diversity was evaluated. Finally, the risk of off-target CRISPR activity throughout the genome was evaluated using Target Enriched GUIDE-seq (TEG-seq) 2 followed by next generation sequencing (NGS) validation of putative off-target sites. Results Using five TGFBR2-directed guide RNAs (gRNAs), we achieved gene disruption efficiencies ranging from 48%-90%, which correlated inversely with the degree of SMAD phosphorylation after TGF-b exposure (r=-0.9440, p=0.0158, n=4 donors) (figure 1A-C).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%