2016 9th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/bmeicon.2016.7859599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teeth segmentation from dental x-ray image by template matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grzegorzek et al [5] presented a multi-stage approach for teeth segmentation from dentition surfaces based on a 2D model-based contour retrieval algorithm. Poonsri et al [6] proposed a method to segment teeth from a panoramic dental x-ray image by means of tooth area identification and template matching. However, these methods are unreliable for segmenting teeth in terms of irregular teeth arrangements and indistinctive tooth boundary, and which cannot accurately express the 3D shape of teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grzegorzek et al [5] presented a multi-stage approach for teeth segmentation from dentition surfaces based on a 2D model-based contour retrieval algorithm. Poonsri et al [6] proposed a method to segment teeth from a panoramic dental x-ray image by means of tooth area identification and template matching. However, these methods are unreliable for segmenting teeth in terms of irregular teeth arrangements and indistinctive tooth boundary, and which cannot accurately express the 3D shape of teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed that the segmentation of panoramic X-rays using wavelet transformation shows better results than adaptive and iterative thresholding ( Patanachai, Covavisaruch & Sinthanayothin, 2010 ). Another fully automatic segmentation of the teeth using the template matching technique introduced by Poonsri et al (2016) shows 50% matching accuracy results. In Razali et al (2014) analyzed X-rays for the age estimations by comparing edge detection approaches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dental X-ray image analysis methods can be categorized in several categories: region growing techniques, edge detection methods, thresholding based, clustering techniques, level set, and active contour, etc., are presented in ‘Image processing methods for dental image analysis’ ( Mahoor & Abdel-Mottaleb, 2004 ; Zhou & Abdel-Mottaleb, 2005 ; Nomir & Abdel-Mottaleb, 2005 , 2007 ; Gao & Chae, 2008 ; Oprea et al, 2008 ; Patanachai, Covavisaruch & Sinthanayothin, 2010 ; Harandi & Pourghassem, 2011 ; Hu et al, 2014 ; Amer & Aqel, 2015 ; Zak et al, 2017 ; Avuçlu & Bacsçiftçi, 2020 ) ( Rad et al, 2015 ; Tuan, Ngan & Son, 2016 ; Poonsri et al, 2016 ; Son & Tuan, 2016 , 2017 ; Ali et al, 2018 ; Alsmadi, 2018 ; Obuchowicz Rafałand Nurzynska et al, 2018 ; Tuan et al, 2018 ; Fariza et al, 2019 ; Kumar, Bhadauria & Singh, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image segmentation is done to distinguish between foreground in this case is a dental object, with the background in this case is a part other than teeth [2]. The segmentation process of dental panoramic radiograph has been carried out and get good 26 Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi (Journal of Computer Science and Information), volume 13, issue 1, February 2020 results with various algorithms when applied to a single tooth image [3]- [5]. But this becomes a problem when faced with overlapping teeth [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%