2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14238141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teeth Arrangement and Pole–Slot Combination Design for PMLSM Detent Force Reduction

Abstract: This paper introduces and investigates a new design method that employs both teeth arrangement and pole–slot combination to reduce the detent force of permanent magnet linear synchronous motors (PMLSMs) for precision position control. The proposed topology is a 10-pole, 12-slot-based PMLSM comprising two sections that significantly reduce the detent force without implementing a skewing design. It was analytically and experimentally confirmed that the proposed design effectively reduces detent force with a negl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of electrical slots in the optimal design model was increased by incorporating notches in the stator teeth of the PMSM. The peak-to-peak value of cogging torque is inversely proportional to the least common multiple of poles and slots numbers [31]; this contributed toward a reduction in the cogging torque, and consequently, the torque ripple. The FEA results confirmed that the cogging torque of the optimal model was reduced by 33.3% compared with that of the initial model, as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of electrical slots in the optimal design model was increased by incorporating notches in the stator teeth of the PMSM. The peak-to-peak value of cogging torque is inversely proportional to the least common multiple of poles and slots numbers [31]; this contributed toward a reduction in the cogging torque, and consequently, the torque ripple. The FEA results confirmed that the cogging torque of the optimal model was reduced by 33.3% compared with that of the initial model, as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%