Politics of Disinformation 2021
DOI: 10.1002/9781119743347.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teens, Social Media, and Fake News

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though refraining from actions such as "liking" on, for example, Facebook has implications for self-expression, young news consumers regard it as a positive approach to reducing the generation of fake news on social media. As other research shows (Powers 2017in Mercenier et al, 2021Swart, 2021), teenagers' reflections on social media "like" and "favorite" functions illustrate some level of knowledge about how algorithms impact news selection. But as Swart (2021) observes, teens in this study seem to be concerned about Facebook algorithms, and not Snapchat or Instagram as this excerpt illustrates: "I don't use Facebook very much because of fake news.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Though refraining from actions such as "liking" on, for example, Facebook has implications for self-expression, young news consumers regard it as a positive approach to reducing the generation of fake news on social media. As other research shows (Powers 2017in Mercenier et al, 2021Swart, 2021), teenagers' reflections on social media "like" and "favorite" functions illustrate some level of knowledge about how algorithms impact news selection. But as Swart (2021) observes, teens in this study seem to be concerned about Facebook algorithms, and not Snapchat or Instagram as this excerpt illustrates: "I don't use Facebook very much because of fake news.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Young people in their formative years are often seen as particularly vulnerable to disinformation due to their media consumption habits and cognitive development processes (Middaugh, 2019); however, there could be a crucial advantage in challenging misinformation and building resilience against disinformation in younger years. Cognitive biases such as motivated reasoning hinder challenging political misinformation as corrections compete with internalized partisan and racial identities and rigid ideological reasoning (Lawrence and Sides, 2014;Nyhan and Reifler, 2010).…”
Section: Youth and The Knowledgedeservingness-attitudes Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, young people may better build resilience against disinformation (also, Middaugh, 2019). Increasing age is related to higher exposure, susceptibility and sharing of fake news (for example, Brashier and Schacter, 2020;Grinberg et al, 2019;Guess et al, 2019), explained by cognitive decline, low digital literacy and cognitive biases such as motivated reasoning.…”
Section: Youth and The Knowledgedeservingness-attitudes Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En cuanto al fenómeno de la mis y disinformation, y teniendo en mente la cuestión afectiva, se entiende que las emociones se vuelven clave para el proceso en que opera la circulación de noticias y de informaciones falsas, principalmente por medio de estrategias que construyen las narrativas de manera que apelan a las emociones (Lelo y Fígaro, 2021;Mercenier, 2021). En Tucker et al (2018) se afirma que las emociones son importantes justamente por dificultar que las personas identifiquen la veracidad de una información, como en el caso de la ira.…”
Section: Introducción: La Era De La Desinformaciónunclassified