TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks

Manjeshwar, A.; Agrawal, Dharma P.

doi:10.1109/ipdps.2001.925197

Cited by 1,765 publications

(1,083 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

1,072

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In [15] a new energy efficient routing protocol is introduced that does not provide periodic data monitoring (as in [8]), but instead nodes transmit data only when sudden and drastic changes are sensed by the nodes. As such, this protocol is well suited for time critical applications and compared to [8] achieves less energy consumption and response time.…”

Section: Discussion Of Selected Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study of Protocols for Efficient Data Propagation in Smart Dust Networks

Chatzigiannakis

Dimitriou

Mavronicolas

et al. 2003

Euro-Par 2003 Parallel Processing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Smart Dust is comprised of a vast number of ultra-small fully autonomous computing and communication devices, with very restricted energy and computing capabilities, that co-operate to accomplish a large sensing task. Smart Dust can be very useful in practice i.e. in the local detection of a remote crucial event and the propagation of data reporting its realization to a control center. In this work, we have implemented and experimentally evaluated four protocols (PFR, LTP and two variations of LTP which we here introduce) for local detection and propagation in smart dust networks, under new, more general and realistic modelling assumptions. We comparatively study, by using extensive experiments, their behavior highlighting their relative advantages and disadvantages. All protocols are very successful. In the setting we considered here, PFR seems to be faster while the LTP based protocols are more energy efficient.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Of Selected Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study of Protocols for Efficient Data Propagation in Smart Dust Networks

Chatzigiannakis

Dimitriou

Mavronicolas

et al. 2003

Euro-Par 2003 Parallel Processing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…고정 센서 노드를 사용하는 기 존 연구로 LEACH [4] , LEACH-C [5] , TEEN [6] , APTEEN [7] , PEGASIS [8] 등이 제안되었다. 모바일 센 서 노드를 사용하는 방법은 최근 활발한 연구가 진행 되고 있으며, 네트워크 필드에 존재하는 모든 센서 노 드가 이동성을 갖는 M-LEACH [9] 등의 방법과 데이터 를 수집하는 싱크 노드(Sink node)만 이동성을 갖는 TTDD [10] , CBPER [11] , LURP [12] , D-LURP [13] …”

Section: 그림 1 두 계층 데이터 보급 라우팅 프로토콜unclassified

Mobile Sink Based Energy Efficient Path Setup Method for Wireless Sensor Networks

Yang¹,

Lee²,

Rho³

et al. 2014

The Journal of Korea Information and Communications Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we propose a novel method for path setup that optimizes energy consumptions for wireless sensor network. Existing studies usually generate paths according to Random way point approach so that it requires unnecessary energy consumptions for estimating location of the mobile sink node and transmission paths of packets. To address this problem, we propose a method that creates paths for mobile sink node using the Hilbert curve. Moreover, our method adjusts the path of the mobile sink node according to the density of sensor nodes to minimize data transmission delay. In our experiments, the proposed method outperforms existing work such as TTDD and CBPER by up to 50times in terms of energy efficiency.First Author : LIG Nex1, seunghyun.yang@lignex1.com, 정회원°C orresponding Author : LIG Nex1, victorson@lignex1.com, 정회원 * LIG Nex1, soongyeol.lee@lignex1.com, emessage@lignex1.com 논문번호：KICS2014-08-317, Received August 21, 2014 Revised November 11, 2014; Accepted November 11, 2014 Ⅰ. 서 론

show abstract

“…The cluster heads collect, process, and transfer data from its members or other cluster heads [3]. Examples of clustered-based protocols are Low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy (LEACH), Power-Efficient Gathering in Sensor Information Systems (PEGASIS), Threshold-sensitive energy-efficient sensor network (TEEN), and Adaptive periodic threshold-sensitive energy-efficient sensor network (APTEEN) [12], [16], [17], [18], [19].…”

Section: B Hierarchical Routingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In TEEN nearer sensor nodes construct clusters and this development continues until the sink or base station is obtained [11], [18]. After the construction of clusters, the cluster heads broadcast hard threshold and soft threshold to the sensor nodes.…”

Section: B Hierarchical Routingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hard threshold is the predefined least value for an attribute to induce a sensor node to start its transmission. Likewise, soft threshold is the value that is used to decide whether a significant change occurred in the sensed attribute so that data transmission should take place and thus reduced the number of data transmissions [11], [18]. However, the sensor nodes will never communicate if the threshold value is not reached, which makes this protocol unfeasible for the applications where continuous observation is needed [12].…”

Section: B Hierarchical Routingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Survey on Routing Protocols and Simulation Analysis of WRP, DSR and AODV in Wireless Sensor Networks

Chowdhury¹,

Uddin²,

Noor³

2012

IJMLC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The field of communications networks continues to emerge, thus leading to the rapid growth in the field of wireless sensor networks (WSNs). WSNs are noticeably different from traditional Ad hoc networks. The conspicuous difference between WSNs and traditional Ad hoc networks is that they (WSNs) are strictly constrained by limited supply of energy, capacity of storage, power of computation, and bandwidth. Because of these constraints and random deployment in some cases, it has become a challenge for the researchers to design an unblemished routing layer protocol for wireless sensor networks. In this paper we studied the motivation and design issues for routing protocols in WSNs with the limitations of existing routing protocols for WSNs. We also used GloMoSim-2.03 to find the shortcomings of traditional ad hoc routing protocols (DSR, WRF, AODV) when those are applied to WSN and to find out certain specific scenarios (considering low traffic networks and high traffic networks) of WSN where it is better to employ an existing Ad hoc routing protocol rather than developing a new one.

show abstract

TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks

Cited by 1,765 publications

References 5 publications

A Comparative Study of Protocols for Efficient Data Propagation in Smart Dust Networks

A Comparative Study of Protocols for Efficient Data Propagation in Smart Dust Networks

Mobile Sink Based Energy Efficient Path Setup Method for Wireless Sensor Networks

A Survey on Routing Protocols and Simulation Analysis of WRP, DSR and AODV in Wireless Sensor Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About