2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-014-1682-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonostratigraphic and structural imprints from balanced sections across the north-western Zagros fold-thrust belt, Kurdistan region, NE Iraq

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, recent evidences suggest that suturing of Arabia with Eurasia was followed by the initiation of a new subduction zone south of the Greater Caucasus (Cowgill et al, ) in association with oroclinal bending in the Eastern Pontides‐Lesser Caucasus and the closure of a supposed 200‐ to 280‐km wide oceanic basin (Table ; Van der Boon et al, ), which was in continuity with the Black and Caspian seas back‐arc basins (Greater Caucasus Basin; Cowgill et al, ). Therefore, over the last 40 Myr, 860 to 1,040 km (Table ) of plate convergence must have been accommodated in front of the Arabian indenter via different mechanisms (Table ) such as (1) 80 to 230 km of upper plate shortening in the Bitlis, Taurides‐Anatolides, Pontides, and Lesser Caucasus, for a crustal thickening of 10 to 16 km, respectively (from 34 to 44 and 32 to 48 km, where both estimates include a ~2‐km gain in elevation; Vanacore et al, ), and a current width (strike perpendicular) of the deformed collision zone in front of Arabia of 270 to 460 km, by assuming conservation of mass and in‐plane pure shear deformation (with no erosion); (2) at least 130 km of upper plate shortening in the western Greater Caucasus (Cowgill et al, ); (3) 50 to 80 km of lower plate shortening as proposed for the Zagros Fold and Thrust Belt from NW Iran and Iraq (e.g., Omar et al, , and references therein), which may be a lower limit, because if include shortening in the basement that so far has been documented only in Iran, we would have 150–180 km of lower plate shortening (Vergés et al, ); (4) 50 to 70 km from the extrusion of Anatolia, for a cumulative offset along the North Anatolian Fault of 85 ± 5 km (Şengör et al, ); and (5) 200 to 280 km of oroclinal bending in the Eastern Pontides‐Lesser Caucasus and subduction below the Greater Caucasus (Van der Boon et al, ). These mechanisms would account for 510 to 790 km of plate convergence, while the remaining 70 to 530 km should have been accommodated through the subduction of the Arabian passive margin (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent evidences suggest that suturing of Arabia with Eurasia was followed by the initiation of a new subduction zone south of the Greater Caucasus (Cowgill et al, ) in association with oroclinal bending in the Eastern Pontides‐Lesser Caucasus and the closure of a supposed 200‐ to 280‐km wide oceanic basin (Table ; Van der Boon et al, ), which was in continuity with the Black and Caspian seas back‐arc basins (Greater Caucasus Basin; Cowgill et al, ). Therefore, over the last 40 Myr, 860 to 1,040 km (Table ) of plate convergence must have been accommodated in front of the Arabian indenter via different mechanisms (Table ) such as (1) 80 to 230 km of upper plate shortening in the Bitlis, Taurides‐Anatolides, Pontides, and Lesser Caucasus, for a crustal thickening of 10 to 16 km, respectively (from 34 to 44 and 32 to 48 km, where both estimates include a ~2‐km gain in elevation; Vanacore et al, ), and a current width (strike perpendicular) of the deformed collision zone in front of Arabia of 270 to 460 km, by assuming conservation of mass and in‐plane pure shear deformation (with no erosion); (2) at least 130 km of upper plate shortening in the western Greater Caucasus (Cowgill et al, ); (3) 50 to 80 km of lower plate shortening as proposed for the Zagros Fold and Thrust Belt from NW Iran and Iraq (e.g., Omar et al, , and references therein), which may be a lower limit, because if include shortening in the basement that so far has been documented only in Iran, we would have 150–180 km of lower plate shortening (Vergés et al, ); (4) 50 to 70 km from the extrusion of Anatolia, for a cumulative offset along the North Anatolian Fault of 85 ± 5 km (Şengör et al, ); and (5) 200 to 280 km of oroclinal bending in the Eastern Pontides‐Lesser Caucasus and subduction below the Greater Caucasus (Van der Boon et al, ). These mechanisms would account for 510 to 790 km of plate convergence, while the remaining 70 to 530 km should have been accommodated through the subduction of the Arabian passive margin (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, most shortening structures in the NW Zagros High Folded Zone are SW-verging, with fold wavelengths of 5-10 km (median = 7.4 km) and amplitudes <2.5 km, showing linear to curvilinear hinge lines generated by lateral fold propagation (Fouad, 2014;Le Garzic et al, 2019;Reif et al, 2012;Zebari & Burberry, 2015). In contrast, structures near Mosul and Duhok area of the northwestern-most Zagros, exhibit both SW and NE vergence (Numan and Al-Azzawi, 1993 Tectonics fault-related folds (e.g., Awdal et al, 2013;Balaki & Omar, 2019;Fouad, 2014;László et al, 2012;Omar et al, 2015;Omar & Othman, 2018;Omar & Syan, 2016;Reif et al, 2012;Sapin et al, 2017;Zebari & Burberry, 2015).…”
Section: Structural Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, structures near Mosul and Duhok area of the northwestern‐most Zagros, exhibit both SW and NE vergence (Numan and Al‐Azzawi, 1993). Studies of High Folded Zone structures suggest that most folds are concentric, upright box folds that represent detachment‐folds and minor/occasional fault‐related folds (e.g., Awdal et al, 2013; Balaki & Omar, 2019; Fouad, 2014; László et al, 2012; Omar et al, 2015; Omar & Othman, 2018; Omar & Syan, 2016; Reif et al, 2012; Sapin et al, 2017; Zebari & Burberry, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Marouf (1999) calculated the shortening amount within the High Folded Zone, south east of the current study area to range between 8 and 27%. Omer et al (2015) estimated the partial shortening percentages of four anticlines northeast of the current study area within the High Folded Zone to range between 9.8 and 73.2%. Al-Shali (1992) estimated the regional shortening in parts of the High Folded Zone and Low Folded Zone to be 15%.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%