1989
DOI: 10.1016/0191-8141(89)90037-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonics and hydrogeology of accretionary prisms: role of the décollement zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
2
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
121
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The bulk of the compaction apparently occurred in response to tectonic thickening and increased vertical loads. A small amount of additional compaction also appears to have resulted from lateral compressive stresses (Moore, 1989). However, these lateral compressive effects appear to be relatively small and, given the large scatter in the porosity data, it is hard to judge their significance.…”
Section: Summary and Significance Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The bulk of the compaction apparently occurred in response to tectonic thickening and increased vertical loads. A small amount of additional compaction also appears to have resulted from lateral compressive stresses (Moore, 1989). However, these lateral compressive effects appear to be relatively small and, given the large scatter in the porosity data, it is hard to judge their significance.…”
Section: Summary and Significance Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Convergence rates faster than dewatering may cause hydrofracturing of the basal front of the upper plate. Consequently, an upward migration of the d6collement to a level of minimal efficient friction will favour tectonic erosion, as discussed by Von Huene and Lee (1983), Platt (1989) and Moore (1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low acoustic impedance can be explained by high porosity sustained by high fluid pressure [Moore et al, 1990]. This pore fluid pressure, far higher than hydrostatic, can account for the weak coupling along the décollement [e.g., Moore, 1989]. The prominent reverse-polarity décollement seismic reflection extends from beneath the accretionary prism to $8 km seaward of the deformation front [Bangs et al, 2004].…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%