Proceedings of 10th International Kimberlite Conference 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1170-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic Relationships Between E-Type Cratonic and Ultra-High-Pressure (UHP) Diamond: Implications for Craton Formation and Stabilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The geochemical and isotopic signatures of the eclogite xenoliths from kimberlites are compatible with those of oceanic crustal rocks. The progressively metamorphosed coesite-and diamond-bearing eclogitic assemblages and coesite inclusions in eclogitic diamonds may be viewed as an expression of Archaean and Proterozoic ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) metamorphic events [Helmstaedt, 2013]. The earliest age for these processes, according to dating of diamondiferous eclogite xenoliths, is ~2.9 Ga [Gurney et al, 2010, and references therein].…”
Section: Subduction-related Modification Of the Subcontinental Lithosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The geochemical and isotopic signatures of the eclogite xenoliths from kimberlites are compatible with those of oceanic crustal rocks. The progressively metamorphosed coesite-and diamond-bearing eclogitic assemblages and coesite inclusions in eclogitic diamonds may be viewed as an expression of Archaean and Proterozoic ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) metamorphic events [Helmstaedt, 2013]. The earliest age for these processes, according to dating of diamondiferous eclogite xenoliths, is ~2.9 Ga [Gurney et al, 2010, and references therein].…”
Section: Subduction-related Modification Of the Subcontinental Lithosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest age for these processes, according to dating of diamondiferous eclogite xenoliths, is ~2.9 Ga [Gurney et al, 2010, and references therein]. The appearance of eclogitic UHP metamorphic assemblages at ~2.9 Ga implies that the microcontinental nuclei were coupled with lithospheric roots, which were sufficiently thick and cool to reach the diamond stability field [Helmstaedt, 2013]. The closeness of these dates to the ~2.9 Ga age of the Salma eclogites raises a question whether this is coincidence with or evidence for the onset of plate-tectonically driven regime of crustal evolution?…”
Section: Subduction-related Modification Of the Subcontinental Lithosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Результаты оригинальных независимых исследований [8, 9 и др.] и сопоставление эклогитов Салмы и других регионов [10,11] подтверждают наши выводы об их природе и условиях формирования, но расходятся относительно времени субдукции -то есть времени UHP-метаморфизма.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified