1993
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<0471:tiogdf>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic implications of graphitized diamonds from the Ronda, peridotite massif, southern Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reconcile the trace element evidence for HP fractionation in these pyroxenites and their isotopic signature indicating their derivation from hydrothermally altered crust (AEhemipelagic sediments - Pearson et al, 1991a,b), the authors have interpreted the pyroxenites as crystal segregates from partial melts derived from subducted oceanic crust. Davies et al (1993) postulated a similar origin for the HP (garnet-bearing) pyroxenites of the Ronda massif and suggested a geodynamic scenario involving the origin of the pyroxenites in a suprasubduction mantle wedge during an early evolutionary stage of the Ronda and Beni Bousera orogenic peridotites. Conversely, Garrido and Bodinier (1999) found that the majority of the LP (spinel-bearing) pyroxenites occurring in the granular and plagioclase-tectonite domains of Ronda were formed late in the history of the body by metasomatic replacement of peridotites .…”
Section: Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To reconcile the trace element evidence for HP fractionation in these pyroxenites and their isotopic signature indicating their derivation from hydrothermally altered crust (AEhemipelagic sediments - Pearson et al, 1991a,b), the authors have interpreted the pyroxenites as crystal segregates from partial melts derived from subducted oceanic crust. Davies et al (1993) postulated a similar origin for the HP (garnet-bearing) pyroxenites of the Ronda massif and suggested a geodynamic scenario involving the origin of the pyroxenites in a suprasubduction mantle wedge during an early evolutionary stage of the Ronda and Beni Bousera orogenic peridotites. Conversely, Garrido and Bodinier (1999) found that the majority of the LP (spinel-bearing) pyroxenites occurring in the granular and plagioclase-tectonite domains of Ronda were formed late in the history of the body by metasomatic replacement of peridotites .…”
Section: Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Ronda peridotite massif, the largest known surface exposure of lithospheric mantle, is a thrust sheet within the Alpujarride complex (Lundeen, 1978;Tubia and Cuevas, 1986;Davies et al, 1993).…”
Section: Sw-nementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is probable that the aluminous mafic rocks experienced higher-pressure conditions than high-pressure granulite to eclogite facies expected from petrographic characteristics because graphitized diamond-bearing garnet pyroxenites indicating ultra-high-pressure conditions were reported from both the Ronda and Beni Bousera massifs (Slodkevich, 1983;Pearson et al, 1989;Davies et al, 1993). Note that these diamond-bearing rocks have distinct mineralogical and geochemical signatures from the aluminous mafic rocks (Morishita et al, 2001).…”
Section: Sample Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphitized-diamond-bearing garnet pyroxenites were reported from both massifs (Slodkevich, 1983;Pearson et al, 1989;Davies et al, 1993). The diamond-bearing garnet pyroxenites have distinct differences from the Type II mafic rocks, that is the aluminous mafic rocks (Morishita et al, 2001).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%