2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2006.00307.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic evolution of the Himalaya constrained by detrital 40Ar–39Ar, Sm–Nd and petrographic data from the Siwalik foreland basin succession, SW Nepal

Abstract: 40Ar–39Ar dating of detrital white micas, petrography and heavy mineral analysis and whole‐rock geochemistry has been applied to three time‐equivalent sections through the Siwalik Group molasse in SW Nepal [Tinau Khola section (12–6 Ma), Surai Khola section (12–1 Ma) and Karnali section (16–5 Ma)]. 40Ar–39Ar ages from 1415 single detrital white micas show a peak of ages between 20 and 15 Ma for all the three sections, corresponding to the period of most extensive exhumation of the Greater Himalaya. Lag times o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
140
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(233 reference statements)
16
140
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The timing of the final unroofing of the Greater Himalaya is also poorly defined Bernet et al, 2006;Najman, 2006;Szulc et al, 2006) and should be indicated by influxes of high-grade metamorphic minerals into the Indus Fan. Seeing whether the arrival of this material from the Greater Himalaya coincides with, or likely follows, intensification of the summer monsoon rains would be a critical test of the channel flow and competing orogenic wedge models.…”
Section: Reconstruct Changes In Erosion and Weathering Intensity Overmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing of the final unroofing of the Greater Himalaya is also poorly defined Bernet et al, 2006;Najman, 2006;Szulc et al, 2006) and should be indicated by influxes of high-grade metamorphic minerals into the Indus Fan. Seeing whether the arrival of this material from the Greater Himalaya coincides with, or likely follows, intensification of the summer monsoon rains would be a critical test of the channel flow and competing orogenic wedge models.…”
Section: Reconstruct Changes In Erosion and Weathering Intensity Overmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Irrawaddy River flows, in its upper reaches, through the Gangdese batholith, metamorphic rocks and ophiolites of FIGURE 3 | The lithology map of the drainages of the Irrawaddy, the Salween and the Tanintharyi River basins falling in the Tibet, China, and the Myanmar, modified after (Awasthi et al, 2014;Chapman et al, 2015). possible eastern continuation of the Indus Tsangpo Suture Zone, the volcanics from a Cretaceous arc and sediments produced during the collision (Stephenson and Marshall, 1984;Maury et al, 2004;Najman et al, 2004;Szulc et al, 2006;Allen et al, 2008), associated post-collision intrusive igneous rocks (Darbyshire and Swainbank, 1988) and basic/ultrabasic rocks of the eastern syntaxis of the Himalaya. In the middle reaches, the Irrawaddy drains the Mogok Metamorphic Belt containing schists, gneisses, marble, migmatites, and calc-alkaline plutonics (Figure 3; Chapman et al, 2015).…”
Section: Geology Of the Catchment Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distal eastern equivalents of the molassic Siwalik sequences have been studied in the Bengal fan, in seismic surveys [Curray, 1991] and on two drilling legs (Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 22 and Ocean Drilling Program Leg 116) [Ingersoll and Suczek, 1979;Amano and Taira, 1992]. Drilling has recovered strata as old as about 18 Ma, and detrital geochronology and isotopic studies on these strata indicate that orogenesis had begun prior to this time [e.g., Copeland and Harrison, 1990;Galy et al, 1996;White et al, 2002;Hodges et al, 2005;Szulc et al, 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%