2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12303-017-0044-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic evolution of Precambrian basement massifs and an adjoining fold-and-thrust belt (Gyeonggi Marginal Belt), Korea: An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the southwestern Korean Peninsula, the Hongseong-Imjingang belt (Figure 1), which is also called the Gyeonggi marginal belt [29], along the western Gyeonggi Massif has been considered as part of the most plausible collisional belt in the Korean Peninsula. The belt is correlated to the Qinling-Dabie-Sulu belt between the North and South China cratons in terms of collisional tectonics [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Geological Setting and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the southwestern Korean Peninsula, the Hongseong-Imjingang belt (Figure 1), which is also called the Gyeonggi marginal belt [29], along the western Gyeonggi Massif has been considered as part of the most plausible collisional belt in the Korean Peninsula. The belt is correlated to the Qinling-Dabie-Sulu belt between the North and South China cratons in terms of collisional tectonics [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Geological Setting and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee, Choi, and Orihashi () constrained the age of the Yulli Group between 2.18 Ga and 2.01 Ga based on detrital zircon U–Pb ages. More recently, M. Cho et al () provided a comprehensive Paleoproterozoic history of the Yeongnam Massif: (i) the metasedimentary rocks were deposited during the period of 2.18−1.98 Ga; (ii) these rocks were intruded by arc‐related granitic magmatism at 1.99−1.96 Ga; and (iii) subsequently the metasedimentary rocks and granitoids underwent metamorphism at 1.9−1.85 Ga (see also N. Kim et al, ).…”
Section: Geochronological Data and Their Paleogeographical Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shared lithologies and metamorphic evolution histories of the three Precambrian massifs suggest that they collectively comprise the Paleoproterozoic (ca. 2.0-1.85 Ga) arc system and a collisional orogen probably stretching from the eastern North China Craton (Cho et al, 2017b). After a long magmatic quiescence from the Paleoproterozoic to the middle Paleozoic, the peninsula experienced another series of tectonothermal events related to the internal continental collision and external oceanic plate subduction.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%