1986
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(86)90265-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic development of the New Madrid rift complex, Mississippi embayment, North America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
71
2
Order By: Relevance
“…30.1), somewhat similar to that of ocean basins (Sleep 1971 well-developed initial rift phases, marked by arrays of extensional faults and associated graben and half-graben, though this may be due in part to the poor seismic imaging of the base of cratonic basins preserved on land. Cratonic basins are located on continental lithosphere, away from the plate margin, but in some cases connected by a rift or failed rift zone to the ocean, as in the Neoproterozoic Centralian Superbasin of Australia (Walter et al, 1995;Lindsay 2002), the Lower Paleozoic Illinois and Oklahoma basins of USA (Braile et al, 1986;Kolata and Nelson 1990), and the Mesozoic phase of the Chad Basin of northcentral Africa (Burke 1976). This geometry suggests that many cratonic basins lie at the tips of failed rifts extending into the continental plate at a high angle from the extensional plate margin, which may be the site of former triple junctions (Burke and Dewey, 1973).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30.1), somewhat similar to that of ocean basins (Sleep 1971 well-developed initial rift phases, marked by arrays of extensional faults and associated graben and half-graben, though this may be due in part to the poor seismic imaging of the base of cratonic basins preserved on land. Cratonic basins are located on continental lithosphere, away from the plate margin, but in some cases connected by a rift or failed rift zone to the ocean, as in the Neoproterozoic Centralian Superbasin of Australia (Walter et al, 1995;Lindsay 2002), the Lower Paleozoic Illinois and Oklahoma basins of USA (Braile et al, 1986;Kolata and Nelson 1990), and the Mesozoic phase of the Chad Basin of northcentral Africa (Burke 1976). This geometry suggests that many cratonic basins lie at the tips of failed rifts extending into the continental plate at a high angle from the extensional plate margin, which may be the site of former triple junctions (Burke and Dewey, 1973).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another model (Gomberg and Ellis, 1994) the seismic zone is loaded with slip on deep vertical faults, which is particularly effective in loading the strike-slip fault segments of the NMSZ. The models of McKeown and Diehl (1994) and Braile et al (1986) are based, respectively, on the presence of high pore fluid pressure and weakness of pre-existing faults in the Reelfoot Rift, and they are consistent with the fact that reactivation of ancient rifts under a new stress field is established in many other regions. The models of Campbell (1978), Long (1978), and Hildenbrand (1985) are based on the contrast in elastic moduli between the NMSZ and the Missouri batholith, which intersects the NMSZ along its most seismically active parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…These systems, which occur along passive continental margins, coincide with many of the Earth's largest rivers (cf. Burke and Dewey, 1973;Potter, 1978;Bridgland, 2002), including the Amazon (Potter, 1997), Rhine (Reugg, 1994) and Mississippi, the latter seemingly involving reactivation of rifting from an earlier oceanic (Iapetus) cycle (Braille et al, 1986). The modern Bristol Channel lowland can be seen to have its origin in a much older rift system (Kamerling, 1979;Nemčok et al, 1995;Belayneh and Cosgrove, 2010) that was utilized by the Triassic river system that deposited parts of the NRS (see above).…”
Section: Discussion and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%