2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic and structural setting of the northeastern central Gulf of Suez area using aeromagnetic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Separation of regional and residual aeromagnetic anomalies is considered very essential before any qualitative and quantitative interpretation process. The reason is that the observed aeromagnetic anomalies represent the combined effects of sources under different depth, density, or magnetic variation, especially for metallic deposits (Abdelrahman and Sharafeldin, 1996;Al-Rahim, 2016;Zahra and Nakhla, 2016). What really needs to be inversed is the mineralization-targeted or residual anomalies after removing the regional (background) anomalies and the neighboring interferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Separation of regional and residual aeromagnetic anomalies is considered very essential before any qualitative and quantitative interpretation process. The reason is that the observed aeromagnetic anomalies represent the combined effects of sources under different depth, density, or magnetic variation, especially for metallic deposits (Abdelrahman and Sharafeldin, 1996;Al-Rahim, 2016;Zahra and Nakhla, 2016). What really needs to be inversed is the mineralization-targeted or residual anomalies after removing the regional (background) anomalies and the neighboring interferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What really needs to be inversed is the mineralization-targeted or residual anomalies after removing the regional (background) anomalies and the neighboring interferences. There are some filtering techniques that have been applied to deal with this regional-residual separation issue, such as graphical separation (Gupta and Ramani, 1980), radial power spectrum analysis (Zahra and Nakhla, 2016;Elkhateeb and Abdellatif, 2018), match filter (Spector and Grant, 1970), preferential filtering method (Guo et al, 2013), polynomial fitting (Martínez-Moreno et al, 2015;Gabtni and Jallouli, 2017;Innocent et al, 2019), fast Fourier transform (Saada et al, 2022), and upward continuation (Eldosouky et al, 2022). However, there are no unique and absolute solutions for regional-residual anomaly separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%