2022
DOI: 10.33423/jhetp.v22i10.5383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technostress Creators in Higher Education During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Faculty Perceptions and Experiences

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to advance the scholarship related to techno-distress in higher education. Two surveys were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic of college and university professors to evaluate technostress creator perceptions. The Technostress Creators Scale (Tarafdar et al., 2007) was used to measure the technostress of college and university faculty early in the pandemic ( 2020), (n = 307) and one year later ( 2021), (n = 94). The cross-sectional quantitative study revealed that faculty techn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pandemic impact on higher education included an unprecedented shift to emergency remote teaching and disruptions in internship placements (Neuwirth et al., 2021). These disruptions created stress for both faculty and students who adjusted to sudden changes in classroom and work settings (Boyer‐Davis & Berry, 2022). The struggle in this process exacerbated pre‐existing issues of inequity in the system of higher education (Washburn et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pandemic impact on higher education included an unprecedented shift to emergency remote teaching and disruptions in internship placements (Neuwirth et al., 2021). These disruptions created stress for both faculty and students who adjusted to sudden changes in classroom and work settings (Boyer‐Davis & Berry, 2022). The struggle in this process exacerbated pre‐existing issues of inequity in the system of higher education (Washburn et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%