2008
DOI: 10.1787/244764462745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology Transfer and the Economic Implications of the Strengthening of Intellectual Property Rights in Developing Countries

Abstract: This paper presents an empirical analysis of the influence of the strength of intellectual property rights (IPRs) on technology transfer to developing nations. The core contribution is to use regression analysis to examine the relationship between various measures of technology transfer and a set of indexes that quantify the strength of IPRs based on laws on the books, while controlling for other factors. For this purpose, the authors have assembled a data set covering a broad international panel of countries … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Park and Lippoldt (2008) show, other things being equal, that IPR significantly and positively influences the stock of direct investment received by developing countries. Their work, conducted for a panel of developing countries over the period 1990-2005 also shows that IPR attract foreign direct investments in technology-intensive sectors ( such as chemicals and machinery) .…”
Section: The Relationship Between Ipr Protection and Fdimentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, Park and Lippoldt (2008) show, other things being equal, that IPR significantly and positively influences the stock of direct investment received by developing countries. Their work, conducted for a panel of developing countries over the period 1990-2005 also shows that IPR attract foreign direct investments in technology-intensive sectors ( such as chemicals and machinery) .…”
Section: The Relationship Between Ipr Protection and Fdimentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It is built from models of Park and Lippoldt (2008) and Lee and Mansfield (1996). It is also assumed that the developing country' attractiveness of FDI depends on the level of its human capital and its economic stability.…”
Section: Equation 2: Relationship Between Fdi and Iprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar analysis, Park and Lippoldt (2008) Ito and Wakasugi (2007) distinguish between different types of FDI. They estimate the probability that affiliates of Japanese manufacturing multinational companies engage in R&D in a sample of developed and developing host countries.…”
Section: Technology Transfer Through Fdimentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Based on the U.S. experience, we can infer that a development of IPR would have more positive effects in newly industrialized countries than many economists and politicians believe. Park and Ginarte (1997) and Park and Lippoldt (2008) empirically test the positive effects of strengthening the IPR system by constructing a proxy variable that tries to measure the degree of IPR protection in various countries through the quantification of qualitative legal elements. Their findings demonstrate the possible positive effects, such as incentives to trade, reception of foreign investments and technologies, incentives to invest in R&D, and incentives to create own technologies and export them.…”
Section: Strength Of the Patent System Innovation And Imitationmentioning
confidence: 99%