2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnur.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology to promote safe mobility in the elderly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the content of educational program was carefully derived from well recognized ergonomic literature and confirmed by expert panel, it seems that this education could help the participants in intervention group to become aware of the ergonomic problems natured in their job and then to link these problems to MSDs, therefore, this explanation could be another reason for increased VAS scores among intervention group. With this regard, the result of the current study regarding MSDs is similar to previous researches (48)(49)(50)(51)(52).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the content of educational program was carefully derived from well recognized ergonomic literature and confirmed by expert panel, it seems that this education could help the participants in intervention group to become aware of the ergonomic problems natured in their job and then to link these problems to MSDs, therefore, this explanation could be another reason for increased VAS scores among intervention group. With this regard, the result of the current study regarding MSDs is similar to previous researches (48)(49)(50)(51)(52).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, beyond the MSDs self-report results, the study has focused on other outcome variables such as RULA scores, and stage change theory constructs. Furthermore, there are evidences that training, and even use of back belts are not always effective in reducing caregiver injuries (47)(48)(49). Given the complexity of MSDs, multifaceted programs are more likely to be effective than any single intervention (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S A F E T Y / R I S K S Many articles mention in passing that surveillance technologies could lead to a reduction of serious incidents or increased safety, but frequently they do not substantiate this claim (Marr, 1989;Futrell and Melillo, 2002;Welsh et al, 2003;Nelson et al, 2004;Mental Welfare Commission Scotland (MWCS), 2005;Sävenstedt et al, 2006;Robinson et al, 2007b;; Table 1. Central themes and subthemes on effectiveness and acceptability of surveillance technologies in residential care for people with dementia and ID as covered in the literature EFFICACY Aud 2004;Blackburn, 1988;Bharucha et al, 2009;Gaffney, 1986;Kearns et al, 2007;McShane et al, 1998;Miskelly, 2004;Negley et al, 1990;Nijhof et al, 2009;Robinson et al, 2006Schikhof and Mulder, 2008;Topo, 2009 DUTY OF CARE VS.…”
Section: F U N C T I O N a L E F F I C Ac Ymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nurses would benefit from exposure to technologies that could improve patient and caregiver safety [48]. The hospital should provide more training and resources to encourage staff to reduce restraint use.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%