Technology supported collaborative learning for higher education: Comparative case studies in Tanzania

Abstract

To learn, a person has to be able to communicate effectively with others about the knowledge to be learned. Communication processes in classrooms can be supported by Group Support Systems (GSS), that enable students to communicate anonymously and in parallel. Group Support Systems experiences suggest that the technology increases observed learning, self-reported learning, on-task participation, and satisfaction with the learning experience. The authors discuss case studies from higher education in Tanzania. The particular benefit of GSS in this environment was threefold: First, it encouraged meaningful interaction among students and between students and teachers. Local culture normally hinders this. Second, it allowed all participants to discuss sensitive topics freely. Finally, it exposed students to collaborative technologies that are expected to play a pivotal role in (global) collaborative development activities. Clearly, the use of collaborative technologies enables the participation of a broader range of students. C 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Prioritisation of specialist health care services; not NICE, not easy but it can be done

“…This method employed a voting system using TurningPoint TM software and a set of wireless handsets to enable parallel, simultaneous and anonymous individual inputs, generating a group outcome that can be accessed and displayed in various ways at the meeting or later (18). Research into specific features of this form of group decision support has reported gains in meeting efficiency (19), improved levels of participation and a reduction in potentially negative influences from dominant members of the group (20) and thus seemed a beneficial approach to facilitate the panel recommendations.…”

The postgraduate student experience of study support: a phenomenographic analysis

“…Such responses include those emerging from the Australian context, which incorporates perspectives on the repositioning of academic literacy within communities of practice (Hirst et al 2004), and examinations of the role of academic language and learning advisors (Chanock 2007). Similarly, collaborative models for integrating information literacy into the wider work of universities in the American context (Brasley 2008), and technology-supported collaborative learning models in the African context (Vreede and Mgaya 2006) situate this study in a wider body of thinking concerned with how higher education students develop as thinkers, readers and writers.…”

Grasping the nettle and enduring the pain: healthcare priority setting and disinvestment in the context of prudent healthcare

“…This is a voting system that employs software and a set of wireless handsets to enable parallel, simultaneous and anonymous individual inputs, generating a group outcome that can be accessed and displayed in various ways at the meeting or later (81). Research into specific features of this form of group decision support has reported gains in meeting efficiency (82), improved levels of participation and a reduction in potentially negative influences from dominant members of the group (83).…”

“…Research into specific features of this form of group decision support has reported gains in meeting efficiency (82), improved levels of participation and a reduction in potentially negative influences from dominant members of the group (83). Bringing 'voting' technology into the small group environment to smaller, organisational groups,…”