Abstract:The Latin American Structuralism (LAS) is a significant part of the heterodox tradition in the theory of long run growth, with a focus on the problems of developing economies which started their industrialization process when other regions had already accumulated substantial technological capabilities. The emergence of a centre-periphery system posed specific problems to growth and distribution in laggard economies which LAS discusses in a systematic way. In this paper we presented a simple model which, firstl… Show more
“…Thus, the real exchange rate may gravitate toward some equilibrium if the balance of payments constraints binds, but there is no force that will necessarily drags it when there is a surplus. 29 Thus, an important policy implication of the paper is that the central bank should pay attention to the nominal exchange rate if the authorities care about the real exchange rate; for example, if following a recent literature, they believe that level of the real exchange rate may affect growth (Cimoli & Porcile, 2014;Razmi et al, 2012). Because the system may not converge to any predefined equilibrium real exchange rate (especially if the balance of payments shows a surplus), policies such as reserve accumulation and capital controls may play an important role in shaping the long-run evolution of the economy.…”
Real exchange rates are often ‘disconnected’ from fundamentals. Mean reversion toward equilibrium operates at a slow pace (if it operates at all), and when inflation is low the real exchange rate tracks closely the nominal exchange rate for prolonged periods of time. Using a simple open economy model, we show that including endogenous norms in wage and price setting in an open economy set‐up can lead to hysteresis in the real exchange rate. For a given set of fundamentals, the real exchange rate may settle down at different equilibria and exchange rate policies are not necessarily neutral in the long‐run.
“…Thus, the real exchange rate may gravitate toward some equilibrium if the balance of payments constraints binds, but there is no force that will necessarily drags it when there is a surplus. 29 Thus, an important policy implication of the paper is that the central bank should pay attention to the nominal exchange rate if the authorities care about the real exchange rate; for example, if following a recent literature, they believe that level of the real exchange rate may affect growth (Cimoli & Porcile, 2014;Razmi et al, 2012). Because the system may not converge to any predefined equilibrium real exchange rate (especially if the balance of payments shows a surplus), policies such as reserve accumulation and capital controls may play an important role in shaping the long-run evolution of the economy.…”
Real exchange rates are often ‘disconnected’ from fundamentals. Mean reversion toward equilibrium operates at a slow pace (if it operates at all), and when inflation is low the real exchange rate tracks closely the nominal exchange rate for prolonged periods of time. Using a simple open economy model, we show that including endogenous norms in wage and price setting in an open economy set‐up can lead to hysteresis in the real exchange rate. For a given set of fundamentals, the real exchange rate may settle down at different equilibria and exchange rate policies are not necessarily neutral in the long‐run.
“…As regards the production structure, a diversified economic structure with a large share of knowledge-intensive activities is necessary for equality because it sustains growth and employment (see Rodrik and McMillan, 2011;Cimoli and Porcile, 2014) and provides the income basis for taxes and transfers. In turn, redistributive institutions are necessary to ensure that taxes and transfers favor workers at the bottom of the income distribution and correct the negative impact on equality of skill-biased technical change.…”
Section: The Production Structure Institutions and Income Distributionmentioning
RESUMO: Este artigo discute o papel das instituições e das mudanças estruturais sobre a desigualdade de renda. Argumenta-se que enquanto o gasto social e a transferência de renda são fatores cruciais à melhora da distribuição de renda, a continuidade desse processo depende de mudanças estruturais. A importância relativa dessas variáveis em diferentes países é avaliada e uma tipologia é sugerida. Argumenta-se que os países mais igualitários combinam instituições em favor da redistribuição e estruturas produtivas intensivas em conhecimento. Na Amé-rica Latina, instituições e estrutura produtiva falham em promover a igualdade, o que explica seus elevados níveis de desigualdade. Baseado em uma amostra de países em desenvolvimento e desenvolvidos para o período 1990-2010, este artigo apresenta evidência empírica que suporta este argumento. Instituições que favorecem a distribuição são medidas pelo gasto social como uma porcentagem do PIB, enquanto o papel da estrutura produtiva é medido por indicadores de intensidade tecnológica e pela evolução da produtividade do trabalho. A intensidade tecnológica, por sua vez, é capturada por dois indicadores: o Índice de Complexidade Econômica e o Índice de Intensidade Tecnológica da CEPAL. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Distribuição de renda; mudança estrutural; gasto social.ABSTRACT: This paper discusses the role of institutions and structural change in shaping income inequality. It is argued that while social expenditure and direct redistribution are crucial for improving income distribution, sustainable equality requires structural change. The relative importance of these variables in different countries is analyzed and a typology suggested. It is argued that the most equal countries in the world combine strong institutions in favor of redistribution and knowledge-intensive production structures that sustain growth and employment in the long run. Both institutions and the production structure in Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, vol 37, nº 4 (149), pp 660-679, October-December/2017 Latin America fail to foster equality and this explains its extremely high levels of inequality. The paper presents empirical evidence that supports this view, based on a sample of developed and developing countries for the period 1990-2010. Institutions for redistribution are captured through social expenditures as a percentage of GDP, while the role of structural change is captured by indicators of the technological intensity of production and the evolution of labor productivity. The technological intensity of the production structure is proxied through two indicators, the Economic Complexity Index and the ECLAC Index of Technological Intensity.
“…As in Cimoli and Porcile (2014), a lower gap reduces the opportunities of imitation and catching up, so the higher the gap, the higher its rate of change (see also Narula, 2004). As in Lima (2004), technological innovation is determined by distribution in a non-linear way.…”
Section: Technological Gap and Income Distributionmentioning
Within the commodities price boom, Brazil experienced rising dependency on primary exports, along with falling inequality (as a result, among others, of extensive distributive programs). However, productivity growth was meager during the period. Not only this path is unsustainable in the medium run, but may also have harmed the long-run growth consistent with BOP equilibrium. This paper discusses, in a BOP-dominated macrodynamic model based on Ribeiro et al. (2016), the impact of Brazilian distributive policies in the BOP-constrained rate of growth. It is suggested that distributive programs can harm long-term growth due to rising income elasticity of imports and higher technological gap. Lastly, it is argued that the right balance of public investment and distributive programs would allow a virtuous cycle of growth and income distribution to emerge.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.