2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2007.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology shocks and labor market dynamics: Some evidence and theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While technology shocks have no effect on wages or employment, (10) shows that positive technology shocks reduce prices and thus raise real wages. The prediction that technology shocks reduce prices but do not affect employment and nominal wages is consistent with the findings of Liu and Phaneuf (2007) [37]. Using a structural vector autoregression model, they find that a positive technology shock may either raise or lower per capita hours worked, de-pending on the specification of the model (i.e., whether hours are expressed in terms of log-levels or log-differences).…”
Section: Technology Shockssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…While technology shocks have no effect on wages or employment, (10) shows that positive technology shocks reduce prices and thus raise real wages. The prediction that technology shocks reduce prices but do not affect employment and nominal wages is consistent with the findings of Liu and Phaneuf (2007) [37]. Using a structural vector autoregression model, they find that a positive technology shock may either raise or lower per capita hours worked, de-pending on the specification of the model (i.e., whether hours are expressed in terms of log-levels or log-differences).…”
Section: Technology Shockssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…A growing number of studies identify technology shocks by imposing that they are the only component that can affect the level of productivity in the long run, as originally proposed by Blanchard and Quah (1989). Using this identification scheme Gali (1999), Gali et al (2003), Francis and Ramey (2005), Francis et al (2005), Liu and Phaneuf (2007), Fisher (2006), and Canova et al (2010) find that technology shocks have a contractionary effect on employment. On the other hand, despite using a similar methodology, Christiano et al (2004) obtain the opposite result.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we discussed in Section 6.2, the wage-markup shock and the depreciation shock have the largest variances among all eight structural shocks. The neutral technology shock is of considerable interest because of the debate in the recent literature about its dynamic effects on the labor market variables (e.g., Galí (1999), Christiano, Eichenbaum, and Vigfusson (2003), Uhlig (2004), and Liu and Phaneuf (2007)). …”
Section: Variance Decompositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%