Technology, safety, and costs of decommissioning reference nuclear research and test reactors. Appendices

Konzek, G.J.; Ludwick, J.D.; Kennedy, W.E.; Smith, R.I.

doi:10.2172/5371779

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Example applications of the ARCL method from this early NRC effort to reactors. that directly relate to this study are contained in reports by Smith, Konzek, and Kennedy (1978), Oak et al (1980), and Konzek et al (1981).…”

Section: History Of the Arcl Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A manual for applying the allowable residual contamination level method for decommissioning facilities on the Hanford Site

Napier¹,

Piepel²,

Kennedy³

et al. 1988

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: History Of the Arcl Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A manual for applying the allowable residual contamination level method for decommissioning facilities on the Hanford Site

Napier¹,

Piepel²,

Kennedy³

et al. 1988

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A solvent extraction process LLW at, 17-19,128-31 MLLW at, 17-18,211,221-24,228,23746 Fernald Environmental Management Project @'EMF), 12,290 LLW at,[17][18][19][116][117]122,130 MLLW at,[17][18]211, Foreign Research Reactors (FRRs), [41][42] Fort St. Vrain Reactor (FSVR) decommissioning of, 177,183,189,24,37, MLLW at,[17][18]211,228,23746 Greater-than-Class-C (GTCC) low-level waste, 1 1 1 from LWR decommissioning,16,111,14 1, sources and characteristics, 1 1 1, 14 1 199,204 Hanford Site (Hanford), 12,290 environmental restoration at,167,170 HLW at,15,[17][18][47][48][49][52][53][54][55]5740,6244,[66][67][60][61][62]…”

Section: 99mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) wastes fiom, 178,189,203 wastes regulated by, 3 4 8 , 158, 160,209-14, 221-24,237-47 Transuranic waste (TRUW), 3,7,11,15-19,75-107, 160,165-7 1,206-7,209 buried, 7,15-16,19,75,78,106 composition of, 99-105 contact-handled (CH> stored, 3, 17-18,75-78, 84-95,99-102 Uranium mill tailings @MI'), 3,7,[15][16]109, West VaUey Demonstration Project (WVDP), 13,295 HLW at,[13][14][15][17][18][45][46][47][48][49][52][53]5 6 4 7 ,7 6 7 1,73,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]70 chemical composition of future glass, 73 inventory, significant revisions of, 7 1 radionuclide composition of, 70 treatment methods for, 56 zeolite resin, 4 8 4 9 LLW at,[17][18][19]270 Low-Level Radwaste Treatment System, 253,270 MLLW at, 17-18,213,221-24,233,237-46 SNF at,42,206 TRUW at,[17][18][19]…”

Section: 99mentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated data base report--1995: US spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste inventories, projections, and characteristics

1996

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PREFACEThe information in this report summarizes the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) data base for inventories, projections, and characteristics of domestic spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste. This report is updated annually to keep abreast of continual waste inventory and projection changes in both the government and commercial sectors. Baseline information is provided for DOE program planning purposes and to support DOE program decisions. Although the primary purpose of this document is to provide background information for program planning within the DOE community, it has also been found useful by state and local governments, the academic community, and some private citizens. To sustain the objectives of this program in providing accurate and complete data in this field of operation, comments and suggestions to improve the quality and coverage are encouraged. Such comments and any general inquiries should be directed to the U.S. Department An important part of the Integrated Data Base Program is the Steering Committee, whose members provide both generic guidance and technical input. The membership of this committee, shown on the following page, represents all of the major DOE sites and programs for spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste management. Each support committee member is assisted by a technical liaison as needed. The participation and assistance of these individuals are acknowledged with appreciation. S p u e l Rousso, Director Office of Waste Acceptance, The radioactive materials considered, on a chapter-by-chapter basis, are spent nuclear fuel, high-level waste, transuranic waste, low-level waste, commercial uranium mill tailings, DOE Environmental Restoration Program contaminated environmental media, commercial reactor and fuel-cycle facility decommissioning wastes, and mixed (hazardous and radioactive) low-level waste. For most of these categories, current and projected inventories are given through the calendar-year 2030, and the radioactivity and thermal power are calculated based on reported or estimated isotopic compositions. /FL URANIUM MILL TAILINGS FROM COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS OVERVIEW INTRODUCTIONThis report is an update of the previous document' on spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and radioactive waste inventories and projections that was prepared for use in the planning and analysis of various SNF and waste management functions. Quantities of SNF and radioactive wastes produced fiom both commercial and U.S. Radioactive waste originates fiom five major sources: (1) the commercial nuclear fuel cycle; (2) DOE-related activities; (3) institutions such as hospitals, universities, and research foundations; (4) industrial uses of radioisotopes; and (5) mining and milling of uranium ore. The waste is broadly categorized as SNF, high-level waste (HLW), transuranic waste (TRUW), low-level waste (L. L. W), and uranium mill tailings (UMT). Large quantities of radioactive waste also result...

show abstract

“…During the late 1970s and early I98Os, Pacific Northwest Laboratory conducted a number of studies for the NRC to assess the technology, safety, and costs associated with reactor decommissioning (Smith, et a1 ., 1978;Oak, et al, 1980;Wittenbrock, 1982;Murphy and Holter, 1982;Konzek, et al, 1982). These studies were based on extremely limited radionuclide source terms for residual radioactivity within a retired nuclear power plant.…”

Section: Background Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiological characterization of spent control rod assemblies

Lepel¹,

Robertson²,

Thomas³

et al. 1995

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Technology, safety, and costs of decommissioning reference nuclear research and test reactors. Appendices

Abstract: Single copies of NRC draft reports are available free upon written request to the

Cited by 5 publications

References 1 publication

A manual for applying the allowable residual contamination level method for decommissioning facilities on the Hanford Site

A manual for applying the allowable residual contamination level method for decommissioning facilities on the Hanford Site

Integrated data base report--1995: US spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste inventories, projections, and characteristics

Radiological characterization of spent control rod assemblies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About