2000
DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2000.002874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology marketing: a new core competence of technology-intensive enterprises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though open innovation practices have always existed, they were until recently more an ad hoc activity than a systematic one (Tschirky et al 2000).…”
Section: The Value Proposition: Open Innovation the Big Dividementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though open innovation practices have always existed, they were until recently more an ad hoc activity than a systematic one (Tschirky et al 2000).…”
Section: The Value Proposition: Open Innovation the Big Dividementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ritter and Gemunden (2004) discussed and analyzed the impact of the dual nature of the key to competitiveness in the network economy. Tschirky et al (2000) pointed out that technology marketing is a new core competence of technology-intensive enterprises. The new core competence is dependent upon new processes and concepts, because known marketing methods do not sufficiently take into account the knowledge-defined uniqueness of technologies as the object of commerce.…”
Section: Viewpoints Of Studies On Managerial Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, it represents a complementary strategy to a firm's product strategies (Tschirky et al, 2000). While product strategies focus exclusively on the product business, external knowledge exploitation is mainly regarded as a potential avenue of diluting a firm's competitive advantage in the product markets (Lorange, 1980).…”
Section: Conflict Of Strategies In the Keep-or-sell Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of incentive systems and other reasons, however, business unit strategies tend to focus exclusively on the local The keep-or-sell decision optimum for their particular business unit and not on the overall optimum for the whole company (Ansoff, 1965;Burgelman, 1983;Richter and Schmidt, 2005). A corporate-level strategy in external knowledge exploitation (Tschirky et al, 2000;Lichtenthaler, 2005) has to balance this focus by showing that external knowledge exploitation may be beneficial even if it negatively affects the competitive position of a particular business unit. From a firm-level perspective, it is appropriate to realize a knowledge transaction if its negative effects are overcompensated by the positive effects for the firm as a whole.…”
Section: Conflict Of Strategies In the Keep-or-sell Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%