Technology Literacy in Undergraduate Medical Education: Review and Survey of the US Medical School Innovation and Technology Programs

Abstract

Background Modern innovations, like machine learning, genomics, and digital health, are being integrated into medical practice at a rapid pace. Physicians in training receive little exposure to the implications, drawbacks, and methodologies of upcoming technologies prior to their deployment. As a result, there is an increasing need for the incorporation of innovation and technology (I&T) training, starting in medical school. Objective We aimed to identify and describe curricular and extracurricular opportunities for innovation in medical technology in US undergraduate medical education to highlight challenges and develop insights for future directions of program development. Methods A review of publicly available I&T program information on the official websites of US allopathic medical schools was conducted in June 2020. Programs were categorized by structure and implementation. The geographic distribution of these categories across US regions was analyzed. A survey was administered to school-affiliated student organizations with a focus on I&T and publicly available contact information. The data collected included the founding year, thematic focus, target audience, activities offered, and participant turnout rate. Results A total of 103 I&T opportunities at 69 distinct Liaison Committee on Medical Education–accredited medical schools were identified and characterized into the following six categories: (1) integrative 4-year curricula, (2) facilitated doctor of medicine/master of science dual degree programs in a related field, (3) interdisciplinary collaborations, (4) areas of concentration, (5) preclinical electives, and (6) student-run clubs. The presence of interdisciplinary collaboration is significantly associated with the presence of student-led initiatives (P=.001). “Starting and running a business in healthcare” and “medical devices” were the most popular thematic focuses of student-led I&T groups, representing 87% (13/15) and 80% (12/15) of respondents, respectively. “Career pathways exploration for students” was the only type of activity that was significantly associated with a high event turnout rate of >26 students per event (P=.03). Conclusions Existing school-led and student-driven opportunities in medical I&T indicate growing national interest and reflect challenges in implementation. The greater visibility of opportunities, collaboration among schools, and development of a centralized network can be considered to better prepare students for the changing landscape of medical practice.

A Call to Support Informatics Curricula in U.S.-Based Residency Education

“…Domains of clinical informatics (CI)-such as telemedicine, 1 large language models, 2 and artificial intelligence (AI) 3 -have touched the lives of medical trainees in recent years. Now more than ever, it is crucial to unlock the potential of CIrelated education in undergraduate medical education (UME) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and graduate medical education (GME). Prior literature regarding medical students suggests that there is interest in CI but a lack of clarity around opportunities for CI training, mentorship, and careers.…”

Bluegrass Biodesign: Why an Integrated Biomedical Engineering Curriculum is Crucial for Medical Education

“…However, formal training in innovation and design is rare in medical education. Notably, undergraduate medical education (UME) has a history of encouraging adaptability within healthcare, promptly restructuring the objectives to ensure that students are wellequipped with the knowledge needed to provide high-quality care [1][2][3]. The implementation of such fundamental changes requires standardization that may often be stagnated by a lack of enthusiasm.…”

“…Recently, there has been a rise in interest for medical students to obtain experience in innovation, the process of biodesign, and entrepreneurship [4]. As a result, several programs have been developed to meet those needs [1]. One of the earliest biodesign innovation programs is the Stanford Biodesign Innovation Program™ [5].…”

“…Although the number of programs has increased, few emphasize the significance of a transdisciplinary approach [1]. In the traditional model of medical education, there are limited opportunities for students to collaborate in transdisciplinary teams working collectively toward the common end goal of enhanced patient health [6,7].…”

Empowerment for the Digital Transformation: Results of a Structured Blended-Learning On-the-Job Training for Practicing Physicians in Germany

“…The European Commission refers to digital competence as one of eight key competences for lifelong learning and describes it as “ the confident and critical use of information society technology (IST) for work, leisure and communication ” [ 8 , 28 ]. Internationally, many programs and efforts invest in the implementation of digital competencies and data literacy into the undergraduate medical curricula [ 9 , 24 , 31 , 32 ]. In addition, specialized graduate studies in subjects related to digital health care are offered [ 9 ].…”