Technology in the British Industrial Revolution

Tomory, Leslie

doi:10.1111/hic3.12306

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 72 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The aspects of the term digitalisation are also analysed in the referenced article with the help of the following selected literature: (Kagermann et al, 2011;Tomory, 2016;Mohajan, 2019, p. 383;Juhász et al, 2020, p. 41;Schwab, 2016;Bauernhansl et al, 2014, pp. 14-30;and Wagner et al, 2017).…”

Section: Qualitative Definition Of Digital Sovereigntymentioning

confidence: 99%

From Quality to Quantity: How Can Digital Sovereignty be Parsed into Measurable Components?

Kaloudis¹

2022

EJOBSAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of digital technologies for state-relevant institutions, government organisations and administrations has grown steadily in recent decades. Therefore, the question arises whether the mastery of these technologies has an influence on a state's ability to act and whether state sovereignty is affected. In the European Union, the concept of digital sovereignty of states is being intensively discussed. However, it is unclear what exactly is meant by the term digital sovereignty and how it can be defined. The research gap is the lack of a clear qualitative and quantitative definition of that term, so that the goal of the article is to provide an overview of a qualitative definition. That is the basis for a quantiative model. To achive that goal a hierarchical component model is developed for concretisation. Furthermore, the components are decomposed into subcomponents, each of which is then quantified by suitable metric parameters, which are populated from secondary data sources for states and subjected to selected quantitative analyses. To verify and validate whether the component model and the parameters are suitable and robust for measuring digital sovereignty, a comparative index is formed and compared with existing indices.

show abstract

Section: Qualitative Definition Of Digital Sovereigntymentioning

confidence: 99%

From Quality to Quantity: How Can Digital Sovereignty be Parsed into Measurable Components?

Kaloudis¹

2022

EJOBSAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To start with the first stage: Worldwide, England was the pioneer 400 years ago with the first revolution (Tomory, 2016). Already at the beginning of the 18th century, its economy was more advanced than the rest of Europe (Mohajan, 2019, p. 383).…”

Section: Literature Review–dealing With Sovereignty and Digitalisationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital sovereignty–European Union's action plan needs a common understanding to succeed

Kaloudis

2021

History Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the states of the European Union (EU), the question currently raised is to what extent dependence on technologies from the USA and China will have a lasting impact on state sovereignty. The concept of digital sovereignty represents the EU's efforts to compensate for the deficits of the past decades caused by an inadequate positioning of Europe as a location for software and hardware development. Autocratic states use the path of digital autarky, the USA a path of liberalisation and high degrees of openness. In the EU, on the other hand, regulation, data protection and liberal values developed over centuries play a major role in the less pronounced IT development. The path of European states to more digital sovereignty has been addressed politically as an “action plan”, but there is still no common understanding or definition of what digital sovereignty exactly means, where the EU and thus also an individual European state stands. There is a lack of a target and a measurable index as well as evaluated measures derived from it. The present article articulates the basis, namely the common understanding and the definition of digital sovereignty. It places the concepts of digitalisation and state sovereignty in a historical framework and locates them in the current literature, then analyses digital sovereignty as a composite term and places it in the context of current research. Finally, a definition is proposed that can serve as the basis for further research to identify an index of digital sovereignty. This definition can also become the basis for EU legislation to implement the “action plan”.

show abstract

“…Quite frequently this subject is investigated in the field of sociology, with the majority of publication being of an applied nature. Meanwhile, the issue dealing with the youth's orientations formation has been already appeared at the initial stage of the Industrial Revolution at the end of the XYIII century (Tomory, 2016). It should be noted that the emergence of higher education in the 1850s in Russia engaged in the training of young specialists is an important step towards the Russian industry development.…”

Section: Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Role Of Youth’s Orientations Totechnical Education In Sustainable Development Of Russian Industry

Merenkov¹

2019

The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article deals with actual issues related to youth's orientations to technical education and the quality of students' training at technical universities. On the one hand, the state provides tuition-free education to school leavers in order to increase the number of young designers, engineers, technologists capable of providing innovative development of industrial enterprises in the country. On the other hand, there is a low level of youth's orientations to technical education. Meanwhile, youth's orientations to technical education can be considered as a factor of the sustainable development of Russian industry. In addition, employers note a low level of young professionals' readiness for professional self-development in the conditions of constant modernization of present-day production. The major research objective is to analyze the youth's orientations to technical education and to assess the quality of technical education in Yekaterinburg. The investigation has revealed that employers do not show activity in the assistance for finding employment for those who intend to realize their knowledge and skills while working in their specialty. The study has shown that the number of those graduates of higher education institutions who work in related specialties or the number of those who are not related to the profession acquired is increasing. The survey has fixed that the majority of them are not satisfied with the level of young engineers' professional competence. It should be concluded that this situation complicates the sustainable development of Russian industrial enterprises due to the constant inflow of young workers' with low-level competence.

show abstract

Technology in the British Industrial Revolution

Cited by 11 publications

References 72 publications

From Quality to Quantity: How Can Digital Sovereignty be Parsed into Measurable Components?

From Quality to Quantity: How Can Digital Sovereignty be Parsed into Measurable Components?

Digital sovereignty–European Union's action plan needs a common understanding to succeed

Role Of Youth’s Orientations Totechnical Education In Sustainable Development Of Russian Industry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About