Technology in the Age of Innovation: Responsible Innovation as a New Subdomain Within the Philosophy of Technology

Abstract

Praised as a panacea for resolving all societal issues, and self-evidently presupposed as technological innovation, the concept of innovation has become the emblem of our age. This is especially reflected in the context of the European Union, where it is considered to play a central role in both strengthening the economy and confronting the current environmental crisis. The pressing question is how technological innovation can be steered into the right direction. To this end, recent frameworks of Responsible Innovation (RI) focus on how to enable outcomes of innovation processes to become societally desirable and ethically acceptable. However, questions with regard to the technological nature of these innovation processes are rarely raised. For this reason, this paper raises the following research question: To what extent is RI possible in the current age, where the concept of innovation is predominantly presupposed as technological innovation? On the one hand, we depart from a post-phenomenological perspective to evaluate the possibility of RI in relation to the particular technological innovations discussed in the RI literature. On the other hand, we emphasize the central role innovation plays in the current age, and suggest that the presupposed concept of innovation projects a technoeconomic paradigm. In doing so, we ultimately argue that in the attempt to steer innovation, frameworks of RI are in fact steered by the techno-economic paradigm inherent in the presupposed concept of innovation. Finally, we account for what implications this has for the societal purpose of RI.

Public Libraries Engaging Communities through Technology and Innovation: Insights from the Library Living Lab

“…3D Capitals (http://librarylivinglab.cvc.uab.cat/home/capitals) is an ongoing project led by the Computer Vision Center (CVC) and the UAB that contributes to giving answers to one of the challenges that research centers currently face -technology transfer with social value, a notion comprised in the Responsible Research Innovation framework (Owen, Macnaghten, and Stilgoe 2012;Stilgoe, Owen, and Macnaghten 2013;von Schomberg and Blok 2020). Digital humanities are becoming a fertile field of experimentation in this direction, and various projects are testing the use of 3D modeling and printing technologies in order to revalue the public cultural heritage and disseminate it to society (Ackerman and Glekas 2017;Merchán et al 2019;Scopigno et al 2017).…”

A high-level overview of AI ethics

“…This is demonstrated by the fact that social and ethical aspects are explicitly taken into account and economic, socio-cultural, and environmental aspects are balanced. 37,38 Engineering ethics Engineering ethics can be thought of in terms of the values and ethical systems relevant to the practice of engineering. Engineering is a term that refers to structuring, design, and building.…”

Rethinking societal engagement under the heading of Responsible Research and Innovation: (novel) requirements and challenges

“…The governance approach Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) was introduced to reconcile the economic imperative of innovation with societal needs and expectations (see for example, Owen et al 2013;Von Schomberg 2013;von Schomberg and Blok 2019). RRI reinforces the call for societal engagement in research and innovation (R&I) processes (Burget, Bardone, and Pedaste 2017), science, technology and innovation governance and business contexts (Chatfield et al 2017;Lubberink et al 2017).…”