E-Mental Health 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20852-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology, Health, and Contemporary Practice: How Does e-Mental Health Fit It and What Does It Offer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Youthfriendly services incorporating new technologies (Ambresin, Bennett, Patton, Sanci, & Sawyer, 2013;Gibson, Cartwright, Kerrisk, Campbell, & Seymour, 2016) such as apps (Burns et al, 2016), show promise in combatting these issues. Despite slow uptake of apps into clinical settings (Blanchard, Herrman, Frere, & Burns, 2012;Schueller et al, 2016), Australia in particular is considered to be progressive with the integration of technology in mental health support services, having utilised various technologies in the past 40 years, including: telephones for consultations, crisis management, and the internet for video assessments and online cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT; Hilty & Mucic, 2016); for example, Curtin University's 'OCD? Not Me!'…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Youthfriendly services incorporating new technologies (Ambresin, Bennett, Patton, Sanci, & Sawyer, 2013;Gibson, Cartwright, Kerrisk, Campbell, & Seymour, 2016) such as apps (Burns et al, 2016), show promise in combatting these issues. Despite slow uptake of apps into clinical settings (Blanchard, Herrman, Frere, & Burns, 2012;Schueller et al, 2016), Australia in particular is considered to be progressive with the integration of technology in mental health support services, having utilised various technologies in the past 40 years, including: telephones for consultations, crisis management, and the internet for video assessments and online cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT; Hilty & Mucic, 2016); for example, Curtin University's 'OCD? Not Me!'…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, this sense of connection didn't only arise from the explicitly "social" affordances in eRecovery but were also identified as arising from the prompts provided by the daily check-in, and appointment and medication reminders: It is well established that social media can generate a sense of social connectedness independent of direct social interactions arising from family, employment, or recreational activity. Yet, in offering this, therapeutic apps may raise privacy and confidentiality-related concerns, especially for people with mental health conditions (Hilty & Mucic, 2016) Conversely, there are factors that will contribute to counterproductive engagement (Smith et al, 2017) leading to eventually abandoning the software or being barred from use. Such counterproductive engagement can take the form of clients repurposing the affordances of forensic technologies to pursue harmful ends, such as abusing another client.…”
Section: Technology In Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly all anxiety disorders involve intense feelings of fear and the anticipation of imminent harm (Hilty and Mucic, 2016;Rachman, 2020). A short review of several types of anxiety shows subtler aspects of the problem.…”
Section: The Patient Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%