Technology Gap Efficiency of Small-Scale Rice Processors in Anambra State, Nigeria

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the technology gap efficiency of small-scale rice processors in Anambra State, Nigeria. The research was conducted through a survey of 100 small-scale rice processors in Anambra State. Data were collected with structured questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive, stochastic frontier analysis, stochastic meta-frontier model, and inferential statistical techniques. The study revealed that important variables to rice processing present in the state are paddy, firewood, water, and huller. Concerning the economic-specific factors, the cost of grading and other processing assets contributes to inefficiency. The results equally showed that the technology gap efficiency of small-scale rice processors in the industry is tied to or tangential to the frontier output, meaning that the processors in Anambra State are making use of the best technology available. The average efficiency index for the processors in the industry was 0.506, implying that their output is below potential by 49.4%. The results also revealed the technology gap efficiency for the participating and non-participating processors as 0.924 and 0.983, respectively, meaning that the participants need to close an 8.0% gap, and the non-participants need to close a 2.0% gap. These gaps are caused by the high cost of processing equipment, high cost of input, and inadequate infrastructure, among others contributing factors. The paper concluded that the average meta-technical efficiency (0.498) of small-scale rice processors in Anambra State is low and needs to be improved through the provision of adequate technology, training, and infrastructure to bring the current industrial production capacity to 100.0%.

Profitability Analysis of Upland Rice Production Among Resource Poor Farmers in Kaduna State, Nigeria: A Stochastic Profit Efficiency Frontier Approach

“…The minimum and maximum profit efficiency level obtained by sampled rice farmers was 0.012 (1.2%) and 1.000 (100%) on individual basis. This agrees with findings of who reported similar profit efficiency in rice production (Obianefo, 2023).…”

Análisis de eficiencia técnica y rentabilidad del procesamiento local de arroz en el estado de Kwara, Nigeria

“…thus increasing output modern implement was significant at 5% level and was positively related, which implies that an increase in the adoption of modern implements will increase their efficiency of production. This is in tandem with the conclusion of Obianefo et al (2023). Training was also positively significant at 5% level, which implies that an increase in training for the processors will increase their processing efficiency.…”

A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Maize Production Efficiency and Its Climate-Smart Agricultural Practice Determinants in Southeast, Nigeria

“…In Southeast Nigeria, where maize cultivation is prevalent, understanding the efficiency of maize production under the influence of CSAPs and socioeconomic determinants is essential for devising effective policies aimed at promoting sustainable agriculture and food security. According to Obianefo et al (2021) [55] ; Obianefo et al (2023) [53] and Keghter et al (2023) [35] , Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) has been widely employed to assess the efficiency of agricultural production systems by separating observed output from the maximum achievable output given the same inputs and technology. By estimating the efficiency parameter of maize production, researchers gain insights into the performance of maize farmers relative to the production frontier (Ng'ombe, and Kalinda, 2015; Ng'ombe, 2017; Yakubu et al, 2022) [49,48,68] , thereby identifying areas for improvement and optimization.…”