1996
DOI: 10.1016/0196-8904(95)00279-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology for removing carbon dioxide from power plant flue gas by the physical adsorption method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even so, with the simple aforementioned configuration, CO 2 was concentrated from 17 to 43 % (in volume). CO 2 purity could be further increased by modifiying the original cycle, adding a purge step with part of the CO 2 product [8]. However, it must be beared in mind that using part of the product to increase purity has a negative effect over productivity.…”
Section: Cyclic Adsorption Experiments With Co 2 /N 2 Binary Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even so, with the simple aforementioned configuration, CO 2 was concentrated from 17 to 43 % (in volume). CO 2 purity could be further increased by modifiying the original cycle, adding a purge step with part of the CO 2 product [8]. However, it must be beared in mind that using part of the product to increase purity has a negative effect over productivity.…”
Section: Cyclic Adsorption Experiments With Co 2 /N 2 Binary Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within TSA technologies, the specific case in which the solid is heated by the Joule effect is commonly referred to as electric swing adsorption (ESA) [5,6]. The vast majority of studies dealing with CO 2 post-combustion capture by means of PSA or TSA technologies use zeolites as adsorbent [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Zeolite 13X is by far the adsorbent most extensively studied in CO 2 separation processes, due to its high selectivity to CO 2 [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeolite 13X has higher capacity, but activated carbon is less expensive than zeolite and insensitive to moisture. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Its surface properties can vary considerably, but its approximate pure-CO 2 sorption capacity can be as high as 10 wt % and its carbon dioxide/nitrogen (CO 2 / N 2 ) selectivity is on the order of 10, at 1 bar and 25°C. [12][13][14][15] Other types of carbonaceous sorbents, such as charcoal and coal, have been studied in a different CO 2 context; [16][17][18][19] however, they have not been explored or proposed for carbon capture from flue gas yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the regeneration method can consist in a combination of heating and evacuation [11][12][13]. The design of an optimised adsorption process is intrinsically related to the adsorbent properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%