2010
DOI: 10.3152/095820210x510124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology cluster evaluation and growth factors: literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…17 While most researchers take a "linear" life cycle approach 18 , Martin and Sunley (2011) propose an adaptive life cycle model, in which development is evolutionary and contingent on district-specific dynamics. In this context, empirical studies show that whilst some clusters develop organically, in others, the support and intervention of "facilitators" can play an important role in building a platform for trust and "co-opetition" 19 and promoting a flow of information, ideas and resources (Gagne et al, 2010;Ingstrup and Damgaard, 2013;Mesquita, 2007). Thus, the presence of a facilitator, by coordinating and promoting the process of district development, has the potential to contribute to its resilience.…”
Section: Co-operation and The "New Competition": Re-discovery Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 While most researchers take a "linear" life cycle approach 18 , Martin and Sunley (2011) propose an adaptive life cycle model, in which development is evolutionary and contingent on district-specific dynamics. In this context, empirical studies show that whilst some clusters develop organically, in others, the support and intervention of "facilitators" can play an important role in building a platform for trust and "co-opetition" 19 and promoting a flow of information, ideas and resources (Gagne et al, 2010;Ingstrup and Damgaard, 2013;Mesquita, 2007). Thus, the presence of a facilitator, by coordinating and promoting the process of district development, has the potential to contribute to its resilience.…”
Section: Co-operation and The "New Competition": Re-discovery Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…É válido ressaltar que, entre as estratégias desenvolvidas para assegurar a competitividade de um cluster, deve--se dedicar atenção a fatores que ocasionem sua atratividade, explorando seus diferenciais. Nesse sentido, uma boa gestão de marketing (WANG; WANG, 2010), sobretudo no que diz respeito ao place branding, ou como será tratado neste estudo, marketing de lugar, pode ser um fator crítico para aumentar a competitividade de um cluster (GAGNÉ et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Neste ínterim, esforços políticos para promover arranjos coordenados dessa natureza contribuíram para a formação de redes estratégicas em toda a Europa (Wincent et al, 2013), à exemplo dos polos de competitividade franceses (Bocquet et al, 2016), do Bahavarian High Technology na Alemanha (Falck, Heblich, & Kipar, 2010), e das redes estratégicas suecas (Wincent et al, 2013). O fenômeno também se pronuncia em outras partes do globo, como o Industrial Cluster Project no Japão (Nishimura & Okamuro, 2011) e as iniciativas de clusters tecnológicos promovidas no Canadá (Gagne, Townsend, Bourgeois, & Hart, 2010). No cenário brasileiro estes esforços são reconhecidos no fomento ao desenvolvimento dos Arranjos Produtivos Locais ou APLs (Knorringa & Nadvi, 2016).…”
Section: Redes Estratégicas Regionaisunclassified
“…A alocação eficiente de recursos e tarefas na rede (Sydow & Windeler, 1994;Planko et al, 2017) pode ajudar a driblar a complexidade de coordenação destes arranjos. Além de atrair e mobilizar recursos para a rede (Gagne et al, 2010) os gestores também são responsáveis por promover a transferência, recebimento e integração do conhecimento em toda a rede (Weber & Khademin, 2008). Isto posto, a função de Engajamento e Alocação pode ser operacionalmente definida como:…”
Section: Revisão E Compilação Das Funções De Gerenciamento Das Redesunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation