Technology as Teammate: Examining the Role of External Cognition in Support of Team Cognitive Processes

Abstract

In this paper we advance team theory by describing how cognition occurs across the distribution of members and the artifacts and technology that support their efforts. We draw from complementary theorizing coming out of cognitive engineering and cognitive science that views forms of cognition as external and extended and integrate this with theorizing on macrocognition in teams. Two frameworks are described that provide the groundwork for advancing theory and aid in the development of more precise measures for understanding team cognition via focus on artifacts and the technologies supporting their development and use. This includes distinctions between teamwork and taskwork and the notion of general and specific competencies from the organizational sciences along with the concepts of offloading and scaffolding from the cognitive sciences. This paper contributes to the team cognition literature along multiple lines. First, it aids theory development by synthesizing a broad set of perspectives on the varied forms of cognition emerging in complex collaborative contexts. Second, it supports research by providing diagnostic guidelines to study how artifacts are related to team cognition. Finally, it supports information systems designers by more precisely describing how to conceptualize team-supporting technology and artifacts. As such, it provides a means to more richly understand process and performance as it occurs within sociotechnical systems. Our overarching objective is to show how team cognition can both be more clearly conceptualized and more precisely measured by integrating theory from cognitive engineering and the cognitive and organizational sciences.

The Evolution of Human-Autonomy Teams in Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems Operations

“…The behavioral complexity of an autonomous agent is actually more than parts appear to be individually. This complexity is a real challenge for robotics and cognitive scientists seeking to understand autonomous agents and their dynamic interactions with both humans and the agent's environment (Klein et al, 2004;Fiore and Wiltshire, 2016). Humans have a similar dynamical complexity, as summarized by Simon (1969), who stated, "viewed as behaving systems, [humans] are quite simple.…”

“…Presently, advancements in machine learning in the development of autonomous agents are allowing agents to interact more effectively with humans (Dautenhahn, 2007), to make intelligent decisions, and to adapt to their task context over time (Cox, 2013). Therefore, autonomous agents are increasingly considered team members, rather than tools or assets (Fiore and Wiltshire, 2016;McNeese et al, 2018) and this has generated research in team science on Human-Autonomy Teams (HAT)s.…”

Collaboration on large interactive displays: a systematic review

“…the number of entry points) condition collaborative processes in the form of the social interaction that unfolds between group members, which manifest for example in turntaking patterns (Schneider et al, 2012). The cognitive aspects are contingent on the properties of LIDs that allow users to offload information processing and problemsolving by externalizing information (Fiore & Wiltshire, 2016). For example, opportunities for collaboratively engaging with external representations can activate concepts in people's long-term memory and thus help them offload and stimulate cognition (Afonso Jaco, Buisine, Barré, Aoussat, & Vernier, 2013).…”

A Social Machine for Transdisciplinary Research

“…Mind is not merely embedded within but extends into the environment of the organism. From this perspective, mind encompasses artifacts that capture and represent knowledge shared by team members and technologies that support the development and use of the artifacts (Fiore & Wiltshire, 2016). In the digital information age, extended cognition places intelligence into networks of interacting humans and machines (Ito, 2016).…”

“…A boundary object is a tangible artifact that acts as a bridge for facilitating coordination and collaboration across disciplinary borders and maintaining shared representations of team knowledge. Boundary objects are a technology-based form of transactive memory that emerges from the transactive memory system of a team (Fiore & Wiltshire, 2016).…”