2009
DOI: 10.1177/0959354309103543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology as Materialized Action and Its Ambivalences

Abstract: The paper attempts to overcome an abstract juxtaposition of human beings and technology and to develop an understanding of the technological mediation of human subjectivity and the inner relation between sociability and materiality. In contrast to the widespread notion of technological products being unproblematic means to an end, solely expanding human agency and disposition over the world, the argumentation puts the case for an understanding of technology as materialized action and contradictory forms of lif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technological tools are both 'materialized actions' (Schraube, 2009) and resources for the materiality of learning (Sorensen, 2009), as well as active agents able to transform malleable humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological tools are both 'materialized actions' (Schraube, 2009) and resources for the materiality of learning (Sorensen, 2009), as well as active agents able to transform malleable humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can underscore this argument by emphasizing the psychological insight that the subjective and simultaneously cultural nature of knowledge and objects of practice (cf. Schraube, 2009) is always connected to people's motivational and emotional way of experiencing the world. This is also true for the two modes of knowing: The knowing subject brings about imagination and anticipation on the one hand, and reflection and judgments on the other, both understandable only in relation to a particular situation.…”
Section: Collective Knowing As Relational Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Science in technoscience is not done by those who object but rather by those who invent in intended and unintended collaborations. Science in technoscience is intersubjectively 'materialized action' (Schraube, 2009). Consider the making of a chimerical mice, a transgenic lab animal, of the robot Atlas, of earth observation patterns of soil erosion, the visualisation of neural networks, climate simulations, synthetic molecules etc.…”
Section: Distributed Invention Powermentioning
confidence: 99%