2018
DOI: 10.18352/ijc.784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology as integrated into institutions: expanding the list of actors affecting institutional conditions of cooperation

Abstract: This study seeks to overcome the gap between institutions and technology in the literature of the commons. It emphasises the importance of inviting and testing different technologies as actors that are of importance for resolving social dilemmas. In this study, a test is carried out to see if a certain accounting technology mediates factors that facilitate the sustainable management of commons. The technology that is tested in this study regards 'notched sticks' that were used as accounting in self-governed fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, while scholars engaging ideas such as networks and entanglements comprised of social and natural elements have developed radical ontological platforms to account for non-human agency and its implications (Callon 1984;Latour 2005), common-pool resource theory has also concerned itself with how biophysical characteristics shape the realm of possibility of environmental governance institutions (Schlager et al 1994;Epstein et al 2015). Forsberg (2018), for example, seamlessly integrates poststructuralist Actor-Network Theory with theories of collective action based on modified rational choice theory to show how non-human actors shape institutions for collective action. Additionally, institutionalists studying multi-level and cross-scale linkages in the governance of common-pool resources (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, while scholars engaging ideas such as networks and entanglements comprised of social and natural elements have developed radical ontological platforms to account for non-human agency and its implications (Callon 1984;Latour 2005), common-pool resource theory has also concerned itself with how biophysical characteristics shape the realm of possibility of environmental governance institutions (Schlager et al 1994;Epstein et al 2015). Forsberg (2018), for example, seamlessly integrates poststructuralist Actor-Network Theory with theories of collective action based on modified rational choice theory to show how non-human actors shape institutions for collective action. Additionally, institutionalists studying multi-level and cross-scale linkages in the governance of common-pool resources (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…scientists, foundations, States, symbols, and spaces) enable or legitimate particular kinds of governance institutions. Along these lines, Forsberg (2018) examined how a non-human actor (notched sticks) created information networks among groups of commoners and produced the conditions for self-governance of a variety of commons (Forsberg 2018). In other cases, studying the role of non-human elements (e.g.…”
Section: How Do Power Constructs Influence Institutions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La Cabeza de Navasangil (Solosancho, Ávila) también se sitúa en una zona tradicional de movimiento estacional del ganado, la Sierra de la Paramera, uno de los pasos obligados de los rebaños desde el valle hacia la montaña: CABALLERO ARRIBAS y PE-ÑAS PEDRERO, 2012: 235. Lo mismo ocurre en El Cancho del Confesionario (Manzanares el Real, Madrid) y Lerilla (Zamarra, Salamanca): MARTÍN VISO, 2006: 273;2018: 325-326. 25 MARTÍN VISO, 20122013b: 11.…”
Section: Metodologíaunclassified
“…In addition, technology is also an important actor for shaping governance arrangement (Forsberg, 2018), especially given that today communication and coordination are increasingly mediated through information technologies such as social media (e.g., Slack) or collaborative technologies (Teams). While actors can use these technologies for social learning and expanding networks, they can also use them to exercise varying extent of control (Wang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Bricolagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to emphasise that the governance of socioecological systems is increasingly mediated by technologies (Forsberg, 2018;Kooij et al, 2015), especially digital technologies.…”
Section: Bricolagementioning
confidence: 99%