2022
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.21121254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology and Mental Health: State of the Art for Assessment and Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, studies of clinical validation have been scarce, as although digital phenotyping allows for an extensive and broad range of personal data, demonstrating its use and validity in the clinic is challenging especially when many outcomes are personalised. This is particularly so for passive data measures as, unlike standardised diagnostic interview or questionnaire-based measures which are used routinely in clinical trials and outcome management, agreed standards have not been defined for clinical validation of passive digital phenotyping 19. In addition, standardised approaches have not been uniformly applied to assess how advanced analytical methods, including machine learning algorithms, could be used to reduce the complexity of active and passive phenotyping data to deliver clinically actionable predictive models 20.…”
Section: Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, studies of clinical validation have been scarce, as although digital phenotyping allows for an extensive and broad range of personal data, demonstrating its use and validity in the clinic is challenging especially when many outcomes are personalised. This is particularly so for passive data measures as, unlike standardised diagnostic interview or questionnaire-based measures which are used routinely in clinical trials and outcome management, agreed standards have not been defined for clinical validation of passive digital phenotyping 19. In addition, standardised approaches have not been uniformly applied to assess how advanced analytical methods, including machine learning algorithms, could be used to reduce the complexity of active and passive phenotyping data to deliver clinically actionable predictive models 20.…”
Section: Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination is important as although digital phenotyping data may have high reliability, as noted its clinical validity has been sparingly investigated. The transdiagnostic approach may therefore address the challenge of trying to directly associate a new digital signal with a biological endpoint, as although in some areas the results are promising, there have also been examples of inconsistencies in associating particular metrics (such as sleep measures or screen time) with mental health disorders 19. One approach would be new prospective studies, but an alternative or complementary strategy could also be to focus more urgently on developing and implementing agreed standards for measuring and reporting digital phenotyping 2.…”
Section: Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for this combination is to improve the transferability of training effects in specific settings. Compared to CT alone, CT combined with supported employment programs has been shown to generate larger training effects in vocational settings in other populations ( 67 ). This combined protocol may also be beneficial to AD/HD with poor vocational skills.…”
Section: Not Only Computerized Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital phenotyping data can be grouped into ‘active’ and ‘passive’ data collection methods. 5 Active data collection requires users to complete a task such as a survey or a video ‘selfie’, whereas passive approaches involve unobtrusive data collection that occurs automatically (e.g. via sensors in wearables).…”
Section: The Limitations Of Rating Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several active and passive digital phenotyping measures have shown promise as measures of negative symptoms, including geolocation (GPS coordinate data that show location and location changes), accelerometry (measures of movements in three dimensions) and – using audio and video recordings – natural language processing and automated analysis of facial expressions and vocal characteristics. 5 There is preliminary evidence that the five negative symptoms can be distinguished by digital measures.…”
Section: The Limitations Of Rating Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%