2009
DOI: 10.2352/j.imagingsci.technol.2009.53.6.060505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology and Applications of Digital Data Storage on Microfilm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Search engines, web scraping tools, and optical character recognition software have furthermore facilitated the processing of documents much faster than human capacity, while also enabling researchers to recover new perspectives of key historical events (Crossen-White 2015). Yet, in spite of the advantages, it is still important for researchers to remain critical and evaluate whether (and to what extent) the digitization of materials is selective, as is often the case in digitized archives, as well as how digitally accessing materials may affect one's evaluation of them (Voges, Märgner, and Fingscheidt 2009). Many archives have had limited resources to fully digitize their collections, and digitization requests submitted by researchers can (and have) generated a backlog that archives and libraries struggle to process, especially in the wake of pandemic closures (Miller 2013).…”
Section: Participant Recruitment and Data Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Search engines, web scraping tools, and optical character recognition software have furthermore facilitated the processing of documents much faster than human capacity, while also enabling researchers to recover new perspectives of key historical events (Crossen-White 2015). Yet, in spite of the advantages, it is still important for researchers to remain critical and evaluate whether (and to what extent) the digitization of materials is selective, as is often the case in digitized archives, as well as how digitally accessing materials may affect one's evaluation of them (Voges, Märgner, and Fingscheidt 2009). Many archives have had limited resources to fully digitize their collections, and digitization requests submitted by researchers can (and have) generated a backlog that archives and libraries struggle to process, especially in the wake of pandemic closures (Miller 2013).…”
Section: Participant Recruitment and Data Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the limited shelf life of the carrier media and constant rapid technological advancements, data can become unreadable or has to be migrated every few years with high costs and potential data loss. [ 1 ] The current dependence on digital objects, especially with regard to rapidly changing technologies and the regular need to migrate data, as well as the vulnerability of digital storage media to failure or attacks that lead to data loss or manipulation, is not sustainable in the long term. There is a high risk that digital recordings will only be partially readable in the future and will at best provide an incomplete, if not distorted, picture of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 5 ] These archival films have a life expectancy (LE) of several hundreds of years, given appropriate temperature and humidity; [ 6 ] they support the storage of both analog and digital data and are absolutely forgery‐proof. [ 1 ] However, if storage conditions are not ideal, they can potentially still be damaged by mechanical, microbiological and biochemical impacts. Thus, the materials the films consist of have to meet very high standards regarding their durability and resistance to environmental influences in order to achieve a maximum service life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%