Technology-aided assessments of sensorimotor function: current use, barriers and future directions in the view of different stakeholders

Abstract

Background There is growing interest in the use of technology in neurorehabilitation, from robotic to sensor-based devices. These technologies are believed to be excellent tools for quantitative assessment of sensorimotor ability, addressing the shortcomings of traditional clinical assessments. However, clinical adoption of technology-based assessments is very limited. To understand this apparent contradiction, we sought to gather the points-of-view of different stakeholders in the development and use of technology-aided sensorimotor assessments. Methods A questionnaire regarding motivators, barriers, and the future of technology-aided assessments was prepared and disseminated online. To promote discussion, we present an initial analysis of the dataset; raw responses are provided to the community as Supplementary Material. Average responses within stakeholder groups were compared across groups. Additional questions about respondent’s demographics and professional practice were used to obtain a view of the current landscape of sensorimotor assessments and interactions between different stakeholders. Results One hundred forty respondents from 23 countries completed the survey. Respondents were a mix of Clinicians (27%), Research Engineers (34%), Basic Scientists (15%), Medical Industry professionals (16%), Patients (2%) and Others (6%). Most respondents were experienced in rehabilitation within their professions (67% with > 5 years of experience), and had exposure to technology-aided assessments (97% of respondents). In general, stakeholders agreed on reasons for performing assessments, level of details required, current bottlenecks, and future directions. However, there were disagreements between and within stakeholders in aspects such as frequency of assessments, and important factors hindering adoption of technology-aided assessments, e.g., Clinicians’ top factor was cost, while Research Engineers indicated device-dependent factors and lack of standardization. Overall, lack of time, cost, lack of standardization and poor understanding/lack of interpretability were the major factors hindering the adoption of technology-aided assessments in clinical practice. Reimbursement and standardization of technology-aided assessments were rated as the top two activities to pursue in the coming years to promote the field of technology-aided sensorimotor assessments. Conclusions There is an urgent need for standardization in technology-aided assessments. These efforts should be accompanied by quality cross-disciplinary activities, education and alignment of scientific language, to more effectively promote the clinical use of assessment technologies. Trial registration NA; see Declarations section. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12984-019-0519-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. ...

A data-driven framework for selecting and validating digital health metrics: use-case in neurological sensorimotor impairments

“…However, the integration of digital health metrics into clinical routine and research is still inhibited by an insufficient evaluation of the vast amount of existing measures and the need for core sets of validated and clinically relevant measures for the targeted impairments 13,[21][22][23] . Indeed, recent reviews reported the use of over 150 sensor-based metrics for quantifying upper limb sensorimotor impairments and highlighted a clear lack of evidence regarding their pathophysiological motivation and clinimetric properties 13,24 .…”

“…Targeting this objective is important, as the proposed datadriven framework can easily be applied to metrics gathered with other digital health technologies. This will help addressing the lacking evaluation, standardization, and interpretability of digital health metrics, a necessary step to improve their still limited clinical relevance 15,22,23 . Further, the presented use-case establishes a validated core set of metrics for the VPIT, paving the way for its integration into clinical trials in neurorehabilitation.…”

Technology-aided assessment of functionally relevant sensorimotor impairments in arm and hand of post-stroke individuals

“…Further, they mostly focus on kinematic metrics and do not quantify grip force control and its essential role in daily life activities [ 28 , 29 ]. Also, the clinimetric properties of such digital health metrics are often insufficiently evaluated, thereby challenging their interpretability and acceptability as clinical endpoints [ 17 , 30 ].…”

Concurrent Validity of a Virtual Version of Box and Block Test for Patients with Neurological Disorders

“…Currently, there is a growing interest in the use of technology in the Neurorehabilitation field with the aim of quantifying and generating knowledge about sensorimotor disorders after neurological diseases, understanding that the technology has a high potential for using as therapeutic tools [5]. Thus, at present, there are several works that propose virtual versions of this test, in principle designed for stroke patients and using low-cost technology to allow the patient interaction with the virtual application, such as Microsoft Kinect [6] and Leap Motion Controller [7].…”