2017
DOI: 10.17265/2328-2177/2017.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology Adoption and Agricultural Development in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): A Nigerian Case Study

Abstract: This study examines the impact of technology adoption on food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. Using Ukum rural community, Benue State, Nigeria, as case study site which significantly represents other Nigerian-SSA farming communities, the study tracks the impact of farmers' adoption or non-adoption of improved technology on food security vis-à-vis factors shaping their choices. It aims to make the case that adoption boosts productivity and improves food security among others. Fifty farmer-participants were ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The poorest and food-insecure households have little opportunities to invest in this direction and deserve specific pro-poor farm capital allocation especially on a seasonal basis as well as agricultural extension services, institutions, and regulations to guarantee a supportive environment for technology adoption and productivity improvement. However, the literature suggests that improved technology may increase rather than reduce the extent of income seasonality [42]. Therefore, the effects of this process should be monitored carefully and, in case of negative implications on households' food and nutritional status, combined with appropriate consumption smoothing mechanisms [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poorest and food-insecure households have little opportunities to invest in this direction and deserve specific pro-poor farm capital allocation especially on a seasonal basis as well as agricultural extension services, institutions, and regulations to guarantee a supportive environment for technology adoption and productivity improvement. However, the literature suggests that improved technology may increase rather than reduce the extent of income seasonality [42]. Therefore, the effects of this process should be monitored carefully and, in case of negative implications on households' food and nutritional status, combined with appropriate consumption smoothing mechanisms [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited empirical evidence on determinants of adoption lag (time between exposure to/awareness of a technology and its adoption) of SWCPs and its influencing factors. Even though many studies have been conducted on adoption, adoption intensity, and the influencing factors for SWCPs adoption [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], little is known about the specific extent to which farming households delay using the recommended SWCPs. Factors that influence how long the farmers take between exposure to SWCPs and adoption are also not clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%