2008
DOI: 10.3200/joeb.83.6.355-359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology Acceptance in an Academic Context: Faculty Acceptance of Online Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
53
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Using these search terms in Academic Search Premier, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, ERIC, and Education Full Text (H. W. Wilson), we found only three articles from peer-reviewed journals that specifically applied the TAM to higher education faculty who were teaching in an online environment (Alsofyani, Aris, Eynon, & Majid, 2012;Gibson, Harris, & Colaric, 2008;Huang, Deggs, Jabor, & Machtmes, 2011). A search on Google Scholar using "Technology Acceptance Model," "faculty," and "online" yielded 598 results, but a scan of these abstracts again revealed that most of the studies were using data about students or were focused on marketing or online employee training programs.…”
Section: Searching For Research Applying the Tam To Online Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using these search terms in Academic Search Premier, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, ERIC, and Education Full Text (H. W. Wilson), we found only three articles from peer-reviewed journals that specifically applied the TAM to higher education faculty who were teaching in an online environment (Alsofyani, Aris, Eynon, & Majid, 2012;Gibson, Harris, & Colaric, 2008;Huang, Deggs, Jabor, & Machtmes, 2011). A search on Google Scholar using "Technology Acceptance Model," "faculty," and "online" yielded 598 results, but a scan of these abstracts again revealed that most of the studies were using data about students or were focused on marketing or online employee training programs.…”
Section: Searching For Research Applying the Tam To Online Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that students might learn less in online courses is an issue of image, as we have already discussed, but it is also an issue of job relevance. Studies have shown that instructors were deeply concerned about students' ability to learn in online courses (Allen & Seaman, 2012a;Gibson et al, 2008;Osborne, Kriese, Tobey, & Johnson, 2009;Seaman, 2009;Shovein, Huston, Fox, & Damazo, 2005;Stewart et al, 2010). One survey of 10,700 faculty teaching online in the United States showed that 70% believed that learning outcomes for students in online courses were inferior or somewhat inferior to those experienced by students in face-to-face classes (Seaman, 2009).…”
Section: Perceived Usefulness (Pu)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las medidas de otros modelos teóricos que consideran las denominadas normas subjetivas son incapaces de capturar la diferencia entre la motivación interna y los requerimientos externos para cumplir (Genuardi, 2004). El modelo TAM es una herramienta importante y viable para la investigación en el ámbito de las nuevas tecnologías y ya ha sido utilizado en la investigación de la gestión educacional (Gibson et al, 2008 MAYO-AGOSTO, 2015:1-181-196 En una redefinición llevada a cabo en el año 2000, Venkatesh y Davis (2000) proponen agregar otras dimensiones a su modelo original. Ellos proponen el denominado modelo TAM 2, el cual les ayudó a encontrar relaciones entre la puntuación obtenida en cada una de ellas y la probabilidad de uso de una nueva tecnología de la información (su carácter predictivo).…”
Section: Modelo De Aceptación De La Tecnología (Technology Acceptanceunclassified
“…The TAM's utility is evidenced by the numerous modifications and augmentations that have been made by researchers to address the question of technology acceptance as it relates to several variables (Gibson, 2010). Several attempts have been made to enhance the explanatory and predictive utility of TAM.…”
Section: Technology Acceptance Model (Tam)mentioning
confidence: 99%