Photonics 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781119011804.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass function of galaxies has been studied extensively over the past few years out to z ∼ 4 − 5, for both the star forming and quiescent galaxies (Dickinson et al 2003;Fontana et al 2006;Rudnick et al 2006;Elsner et al 2008;Pérez-González et al 2008;Ilbert et al 2013;Muzzin et al 2013). Using a Spitzer IRAC selected sample Pérez-González et al 2008 estimated the stellar mass function of galaxies and calculated the global stellar mass density of ∼ 2.7 × 10 7 M /M pc 3 at 3.0 < z < 3.5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass function of galaxies has been studied extensively over the past few years out to z ∼ 4 − 5, for both the star forming and quiescent galaxies (Dickinson et al 2003;Fontana et al 2006;Rudnick et al 2006;Elsner et al 2008;Pérez-González et al 2008;Ilbert et al 2013;Muzzin et al 2013). Using a Spitzer IRAC selected sample Pérez-González et al 2008 estimated the stellar mass function of galaxies and calculated the global stellar mass density of ∼ 2.7 × 10 7 M /M pc 3 at 3.0 < z < 3.5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top right panel shows a comparison between the integral of the star-formation rate density from field galaxies (black line) and that from GRBs (blue line) with the stellar mass density inferred from rest-frame visible light observations, assuming a standard Salpeter IMF. z < 4 stellar mass densities are estimates from Marchesini et al (2011) andElsner et al (2008) and at z ∼ 6 from Chary (2008). The bottom left panel illustrates the Thomson scattering cross section derived for CMB photons from Planck and that inferred from the SFRs displayed in panel 1, assuming an escape fraction of ionizing photons of 10-20% and assuming the higher Lyman-continuum production rate inferred in Shim et al (2011).…”
Section: Metallicity Constraints On Grb-derived Sfrmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Stellar masses (M * ) of galaxies are usually calculated from multi-wavelength observations (for example Bundy et al 2006;Mortlock et al 2011). Stellar mass functions and stellar mass co-moving volume densities have now been studied in detail, indicating a clear history of stellar mass growth, whereby around half of all stellar mass is in place by z ∼ 1 (e.g., Drory et al 2005;Conselice et al 2007;Elsner et al 2008, Pérez-González et al 2008Mortlock et al 2011;Muzzin et al 2013;Ilbert et al 2013;Duncan et al 2014;Mortlock et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%