2019
DOI: 10.1002/cben.201900009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technologies for the Storage of Hydrogen Part 1: Hydrogen Storage in the Narrower Sense

Abstract: Storage of hydrogen in an efficient and dense manner is still a challenge. In addition to the conventional technologies of compression and liquefaction, there are different approaches trying to enhance the storage density by bonding hydrogen to another substance. Physisorption and chemisorption to organic as well as inorganic carriers are options. Although many of these technologies have not yet gone beyond the technological readiness of lab scale tests, there are a few that have already reached advanced techn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For hydrogen liquefaction, significant losses of hydrogen resulting from heat transfer and large energy requirements severely impede practical application, despite the advantages of higher volumetric density [6]. The density of liquefied hydrogen is much higher compared to compressed hydrogen, but it has the second lowest critical temperature at 33 K, so cryogenic-compressed approaches store hydrogen as a supercritical fluid, which enjoys higher storage density [12] and storage capacity (~5x greater). Hydrogen liquefaction is energy intensive and time consuming, with lost energy content as high as 40%, whereas with compressed gas, it is only 10% [3].…”
Section: Liquefactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For hydrogen liquefaction, significant losses of hydrogen resulting from heat transfer and large energy requirements severely impede practical application, despite the advantages of higher volumetric density [6]. The density of liquefied hydrogen is much higher compared to compressed hydrogen, but it has the second lowest critical temperature at 33 K, so cryogenic-compressed approaches store hydrogen as a supercritical fluid, which enjoys higher storage density [12] and storage capacity (~5x greater). Hydrogen liquefaction is energy intensive and time consuming, with lost energy content as high as 40%, whereas with compressed gas, it is only 10% [3].…”
Section: Liquefactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen liquefaction requires a large capital investment [12,7]. High costs are, in part, due to the need for specialized storage, driven by the demanding requirements imposed by liquid hydrogen.…”
Section: Liquefactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…About 1 m 3 of natural gas hydrate can produce about 170 m 3 of natural gas at STP (standard conditions) [1]. Due to this feature, gas hydrates are researched for a number of diverse areas of application like energy storage [2,[5][6][7], seawater desalination [7][8][9], CO 2 capture [10][11][12][13], and other separation applications [14,15]. Information regarding fundamentals of gas hydrates is well explained in Sloan and Koh [1] and also compiled by several researchers for specific applications [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%