2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16450-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technologies and Systems to Improve Mobility of Visually Impaired People: A State of the Art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper illustrates a case study carried out in the city of Viana do Castelo, in Portugal, in partnership with the City Council and which represents a continuation of previous work carried out in the field of mobility [5]. The main goal is to improve accessibility in the city for various people with reduced mobility (including visually impaired people [6], autistic people, deaf people, people in wheelchairs, elderly and pregnant people or people with children) in order to recommend them the optimal and most suitable route from their current location to an intended destination. The system is based on a Geographic Information System (GIS) that has an annotation of the various streets of the historic center of the city with regard to their suitability for each segment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper illustrates a case study carried out in the city of Viana do Castelo, in Portugal, in partnership with the City Council and which represents a continuation of previous work carried out in the field of mobility [5]. The main goal is to improve accessibility in the city for various people with reduced mobility (including visually impaired people [6], autistic people, deaf people, people in wheelchairs, elderly and pregnant people or people with children) in order to recommend them the optimal and most suitable route from their current location to an intended destination. The system is based on a Geographic Information System (GIS) that has an annotation of the various streets of the historic center of the city with regard to their suitability for each segment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…• Add all the scores for the odd numbered questions (1,3,5,7,9) together and subtract 5 from this: • Add all the scores for the even numbered questions together (2,4,6,8,10) and subtract this number from 25: • Add the scores calculated in steps 1 and 2 together and multiply by 2.5: • Round the number calculated in step 3 to nearest whole number to get the final SUS score.…”
Section: A Algorithms Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their review, however, did not study in detail the algorithms and datasets and did not attempt to present a comparison between systems. Paiva and Gupta [ 11 ] explored indoor and outdoor navigation systems and obstacle detection systems. They identified approaches and equipment used in each one.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some authors choose to set their main focus on reviewing various solutions addressing the components of navigation process (for instance, obstacle detection and avoidance [11,12]), the others take a more holistic approach and assess the pros and cons of assistive technology for navigating in unknown surroundings [13,14]. Solutions tailored to function in very restrictive settings, tests lacking robustness, and the limited involvement of end users were emphasized as major limitations of the existing ETA research initiatives [11,12]. A tradeoff between the accuracy and costs of developing and deploying an indoor navigation solution was highlighted as a limiting factor after a thorough review of various technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wi-Fi was pointed out as the most economically feasible alternative as long as the users can tolerate lower accuracy [15]. The aforementioned reviews provide indications for general research directions in the field; however, these trends are often limited to the insights and assumptions made by the academics and often underestimate the feedback and needs of end users [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%