2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11573-011-0466-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technologiebasierte Spin-offs – Ein Forschungsüberblick zu Einflussgrößen ihrer Entwicklung

Abstract: Zusammenfassung: Technologiebasierte Spin-offs aus öffentlichen Forschungseinrichtungen und privatwirtschaftlichen Unternehmen stellen wichtige Untergruppen junger, innovationsorientierter Unternehmen dar. In diesem Beitrag wird der aktuelle Stand empirischer Forschungsarbeiten bezüg-lich Einflussfaktoren der Unternehmensentwicklung systematisch dargelegt und diskutiert. Besonderes Augenmerk wird dabei auch auf das methodische Vorgehen und die Messung der untersuchten Einflussfaktoren gelegt. Auf Basis der Lit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ventures based on high imitation barriers have a stronger leverage to implement and diffuse their green technologies and realize higher benefits for the environment. This result adds to research on the role of technology attributes on business performance of young firms (Schmidt et al, 2011) by focusing on the impact of imitation barriers from a sustainability perspective.…”
Section: Key Findings and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Ventures based on high imitation barriers have a stronger leverage to implement and diffuse their green technologies and realize higher benefits for the environment. This result adds to research on the role of technology attributes on business performance of young firms (Schmidt et al, 2011) by focusing on the impact of imitation barriers from a sustainability perspective.…”
Section: Key Findings and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Against this background, for the development of the MM, the success factors that have been recognized in previous research were first brought together and assigned to the three perspectives -technology, market and founder (Table 1). (Dickel, 2009;Schmidt, Heinrichs, & Walter, 2011) high level of innovation patentability (Poponi, Braccini, & Ruggieri, 2017;Nerkara & Shaneb, 2003;Preston, 2001;Hasenauer, 2014;Hemer, Berteit, Walter, & Göthner, 2006) clear technology differentiation (Shane, 2004;Hemer, Berteit, Walter, & Göthner, product orientation (Roberts, 1991) wide range of applications (Shane, 2004) high growth industry (Helm & Mauroner, 2007) good availability of qualified employees (Helm & Mauroner, 2007) MARKET market research and analysis (Hemer, Berteit, Walter, & Göthner, 2006;Dickel, 2009;Helm, Mauroner, Dowling, & Pöhlmann, 2013;Cleyn, Jacoby, & Braet, 2009;Zahradnik, Leitner, Raunig, Dömötör, & Jung, 2020) advanced product marketing and sales strategy definition (Hemer, Berteit, Walter, & Göthner, 2006;Cleyn, Jacoby, & Braet, 2009) FOUNDER personality and motivation: achievement motive, self-reliance, leadership, tolerance of ambiguity, creativity/curiosity, internal control conviction, assertiveness, passion, learning orientation, personal commitment, willingness to take risks, etc. (Bigliardi, Galati, & Verbano, 2013;Fallgatter, 2002;Oberländer, 2017;Cromie, 2000;Jacobsen, 2006;Shane, 2004); (Hemer, Berteit, Walter, & Göthner, 2006;Bernhard, 2009;Poponi, Braccini, & Ruggieri, 2017;…”
Section: Success Factors: Technology -Market -Foundermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…social skills, start-up preparation, high education level, industry/practical experience, etc. (Hemer, Berteit, Walter, & Göthner, 2006;Vihervuori, 2017;Hossinger, Chen, & Werner, 2019;Nielsen, 2014;Dowling, 2003); (Schmidt, Heinrichs, & Walter, 2011;Unger, Rauch, Frese, & Rosenbusch, 2011;Davidsson & Honig, 2003) team structure and culture:…”
Section: Success Factors: Technology -Market -Foundermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations