2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological reflectiveness from a managerial capability perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2015). Technological reflectiveness encompasses the perception of a new framework when rethinking the situation for society, extrapolating personal experiences and diligently evaluating the pertinence and utility of the adoption of technological innovations by the members of that society (Andrade-Valbuena and Torres, 2018). Technologically reflective managers are thus often more grounded and stronger in acting on ESI possibilities when provided with the necessary opportunities through corporate support programs.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2015). Technological reflectiveness encompasses the perception of a new framework when rethinking the situation for society, extrapolating personal experiences and diligently evaluating the pertinence and utility of the adoption of technological innovations by the members of that society (Andrade-Valbuena and Torres, 2018). Technologically reflective managers are thus often more grounded and stronger in acting on ESI possibilities when provided with the necessary opportunities through corporate support programs.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study also evaluated Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) index for the measurement model. The results yield that the SRMR index is 0.072, which is less than the threshold of 0.08 (Andrade-Valbuena and Torres, 2018); this goes on to prove that the measurement model has a good fit with the data. Furthermore, the proposed model explains 22.5% of the variance in innovation competency, 15.9% variance in HRSQ and 11.2% variance in BDHRP (Table 9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…To extend the findings, this study performed an importance performance map analysis (IPMA). IPMA aims to highlight the relative importance of constructs on specific target constructs (Andrade-Valbuena and Torres, 2018). The three target constructs including BDHRP, HRSQ and innovation competency were analyzed using the IPMA technique.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations