WRIPUB 2021
DOI: 10.46830/wriwp.21.00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological Pathways for Decarbonizing Petroleum Refining

Abstract: Petroleum refining is among the largest industrial greenhouse gas emission sources in the U.S., producing approximately 13% of U.S. industrial emissions and approximately 3% of all U.S. emissions. While the U.S. must rapidly reduce its reliance on fossil fuels, some demand will remain for petroleum refinery products in the coming decades, and so it is critical that refineries deeply decarbonize. For the U.S. to meet its climate target of net-zero emissions economy-wide by 2050, petroleum use must dramatically … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technology that separates and captures CO 2 molecules from emission streams. This holds great potential for hydrogen and ammonia, which produce highly concentrated CO 2 streams, but it could also be used for refinery fluid catalytic crackers and cement kilns (Byrum et al 2021).…”
Section: Undetermined Abatementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology that separates and captures CO 2 molecules from emission streams. This holds great potential for hydrogen and ammonia, which produce highly concentrated CO 2 streams, but it could also be used for refinery fluid catalytic crackers and cement kilns (Byrum et al 2021).…”
Section: Undetermined Abatementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent modelling studies, as assessed by the IPCC (2022 [29]), tend to have damages modelled as an upward sloping function of temperature increase with damages of 1-7% of GDP by 2100 from a 4°C temperature increase. Econometric estimates of the damages of climate change vary widely, with some finding significant effects only for developing countries (Dell, Jones and Olken, 2012 [36]) while others find very large effects globally (Burke, Hsiang and Miguel, 2015 [37]; Burke, Davis and Diffenbaugh, 2018 [38]). Kahn et al (2021[39]) synthesise the existing empirical literature as supporting roughly a 4-10% GDP loss from a 4°C temperature increase.…”
Section: Box 31 the Costs Of Inaction And The Benefits Of Policy Acti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the massive consumption of nonrenewable primary energy and the increasingly urgent need for environmental protection since the introduction of the slogan “Carbon Neutrality,” it is necessary and urgent to search for environmentally friendly energy sources that can replace fossil fuels, considering both environmental and economic considerations. , Biodiesel, as a renewable biomass fuel with properties similar to diesel, has received widespread attention. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%