2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78462-1_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological Influence on Self-esteem: Towards a Research Agenda Through a Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study (Muriana & Baranauskas, 2021b), we conducted a SLR (Systematic Literature Review) whose key question was "Have technologies been designed to explicitly (positively) affect/impact self-esteem?". Based on the PRISMA protocol (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyzes) (Moher et al, 2010), a specific search string drove an automatic search on the main scientific sources considered by the computer academic community: ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, SpringerLink and Science Direct.…”
Section: Meta-analysis From a Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous study (Muriana & Baranauskas, 2021b), we conducted a SLR (Systematic Literature Review) whose key question was "Have technologies been designed to explicitly (positively) affect/impact self-esteem?". Based on the PRISMA protocol (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyzes) (Moher et al, 2010), a specific search string drove an automatic search on the main scientific sources considered by the computer academic community: ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, SpringerLink and Science Direct.…”
Section: Meta-analysis From a Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the SLR process was conducted in three stages: the automatic search in pre-defined scientific sources, to which we applied a defined search string (resulting in 3,668 papers); the pre-selection, which occurred from the reading of the title and abstract of the papers raised from the previous stage, considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria defined for this stage (resulting in 171 studies); and the final selection, which required us the full and detailed reading the pre-selected papers (resulting in 41 studies). Details of the SLR process and its major results are out of the scope of this paper, and are reported elsewhere (Muriana & Baranauskas, 2021b).…”
Section: Meta-analysis From a Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations