1991
DOI: 10.2307/2098441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological Imports and Technological Effort: An Analysis of their Determinants in Brazilian Firms

Abstract: Logit analysis is employed to measure the effect of selected variables on the probability that a firm (1) purchases imported technology, (2) engages in research and development and (3) controls the quality of its production. Analysis of 4342 industrial establishments show these technological activities to share common determinants: all increase significantly with foreign ownership, exports and firm size. Other variables, including state ownership, profits and effective protection, affect only some activities. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
74
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies report a positive albeit weak relationship between some measure of imported technology and internal R&D (Deolalikar and Evenson, 1989;Lee, 1996;Katrack, 1985;. Using R&D equations, evidence of a complementary relationship is reported by Braga and Willmore (1991) for Brazilian firms, Lee (1996) for Korean firms, and Alvarez (2001) for Chilean firms. In contrast, when evaluating innovation strategies directly in productivity equations, Basant and Fikkert (1996) for Indian manufacturing firms and Zuniga, Guzman, and Brown (2007) for Mexican pharmaceutical firms, found a substitution effect between internal R&D and technology purchasing (multiplicative term of intensities).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Earlier studies report a positive albeit weak relationship between some measure of imported technology and internal R&D (Deolalikar and Evenson, 1989;Lee, 1996;Katrack, 1985;. Using R&D equations, evidence of a complementary relationship is reported by Braga and Willmore (1991) for Brazilian firms, Lee (1996) for Korean firms, and Alvarez (2001) for Chilean firms. In contrast, when evaluating innovation strategies directly in productivity equations, Basant and Fikkert (1996) for Indian manufacturing firms and Zuniga, Guzman, and Brown (2007) for Mexican pharmaceutical firms, found a substitution effect between internal R&D and technology purchasing (multiplicative term of intensities).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, acquiring technology externally helps improving the efficiency of doing in-house R&D. As Aggarwal (2000) points out, external technology sourcing plays two important roles in developing economies: filling gaps in domestic technological capability and upgrading the existing technologies to international standards. By enhancing the technological capability, it may consequently stimulate in-house R&D. Braga and Willmore (1991) found that there is a robust complementary relationship between technology buying and firm technology effort in Brazilian industry. Deolalikar and Evenson (1989) and Kim and Nelson (2000) conclude the same on Indian firm data.…”
Section: In-house Randd and Technology Purchasing: Complements Or Substmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…R & D activities are the core of technological innovation, so the western countries finance these activities in Many scholars study the influence of R & D input on technology transfer. In an empirical research from the point of micro industry and enterprise Deolalikar [5] and Braga [6] found that R & D activity has a significant incentive for technology transfer, so as to improve the productivity; Muscio [7] believes, through his research, that the personnel quality of R & D has an important impact on the technology transfer in enterprise; the research of Bolli [8] shows that science and technology funds input promotes the technology transfer activities of institutions of higher learning.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%