Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change

Abstract

W hile various theories have been proposed to explain how technology leads to organizational change, in general they have focused either on the technology and ignored the influence of human agency, or on social interaction and ignored the technology. In this paper, we propose a new theory of technology-mediated organizational change that bridges these two extremes. Using grounded theory methodology, we conducted a three-year study of an enterprise system implementation. From the data collected, we identified embeddedness as central to the process of change. When embedded in technology, organizational elements such as routines and roles acquire a material aspect, in addition to the ostensive and performative aspects identified by Feldman and Pentland (2003). Our new theory employs the lens of critical realism because in our view, common constructivist perspectives such as structuration theory or actor network theory have limited our understanding of technology as a mediator of organizational change. Using a critical realist perspective, our theory explains the process of change as a three-stage cycle in which the ostensive, performative, and material aspects of organizational elements interact differently in each stage.

Why Does the System Usage Differ Between Organizational Units? – A Case Study in a Knowledge-Intensive Project Organization

“…This paper also recognizes recent literature on coupling in organizations (Fitz-Gerald and Carroll 2006;Volkoff et al 2007;Berente 2009;Marabelli and Newell 2010).…”

Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions

“…Again, the argument is underlined of not treating IS as technical artifacts, but rather as work systems (Alter 2003). This will enable a better integration of institutional forces into the discussion of why IS fail or succeed as well as stressing the need for IS research to focus more on the alignment of IS with organizational processes, in line with concept of organization-enterprise system misfit (Strong and Volkoff 2010;Volkoff et al 2007).…”

“…Following on from the failure of business process reengineering, there is a recognized need to improve business processes before, or at the same time as implementing IT (Lee et al 2008). Related injunctions are to adopt world's best practice (Volkoff et al 2007), and to aim for systems integration by standardizing systems, consolidating data warehouses and so forth (Lee and Myers 2004).…”

More than meets the eye: working around technology in cross-boundary work contexts

“…We extend this perspective by suggesting that transitional cognitive orientation, demonstrated through the interplay of iterational and projective modes, creates productive tensions that allow actors to disengage from their inertia to improvise in order to sustain cross-boundary work practice (c.f. Volkoff et al, 2007).…”