2016
DOI: 10.5194/soil-2-257-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological advancements and their importance for nematode identification

Abstract: Abstract. Nematodes represent a species-rich and morphologically diverse group of metazoans known to inhabit both aquatic and terrestrial environments. Their role as biological indicators and as key players in nutrient cycling has been well documented. Some plant-parasitic species are also known to cause significant losses to crop production. In spite of this, there still exists a huge gap in our knowledge of their diversity due to the enormity of time and expertise often involved in characterising species usi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One factor hampering the study of management effects across multiple study sites is that traditional microscopy is the most common method to study nematodes, which is time‐consuming, requires specialists and is expensive (Ritz, Black, Campbell, Harris, & Wood, ). Molecular methods to assess nematode absolute abundances (qPCR) and diversity (high‐throughput amplicon sequencing, DGGE, T‐RFLP) are faster, cheaper, and allow higher throughput than visual methods (Ahmed, Sapp, Prior, Karssen, & Back, ; Geisen et al, ). Amplicon sequencing may allow identification of taxa that cannot be distinguished morphologically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One factor hampering the study of management effects across multiple study sites is that traditional microscopy is the most common method to study nematodes, which is time‐consuming, requires specialists and is expensive (Ritz, Black, Campbell, Harris, & Wood, ). Molecular methods to assess nematode absolute abundances (qPCR) and diversity (high‐throughput amplicon sequencing, DGGE, T‐RFLP) are faster, cheaper, and allow higher throughput than visual methods (Ahmed, Sapp, Prior, Karssen, & Back, ; Geisen et al, ). Amplicon sequencing may allow identification of taxa that cannot be distinguished morphologically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mtDNA evolves, creating sufficient nucleotide variation for species‐level diagnosis (García & Sánchez‐Puerta, ). Mitochondrial DNA COI was proposed as a molecular marker for DNA barcoding and is capable of discriminating between RKN species more than the rRNA genes (Ahmed et al ., ). Moreover, the mtDNA COII /16S rRNA region has been used in diagnosis and large‐scale regional RKN surveys through PCR and RFLP (Tigano et al ., ; Humphreys‐Pereira et al ., ; Baidoo et al ., ; Karuri et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The mitochondrial genes coxI and coxII have been widely used as DNA markers in various large organismal groups in the animal kingdom [ 60 ]. In terms of resolution, coxI is more capable of discriminating between species than either of the rRNA genes [ 61 ]. Sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers have proven to be a very sensitive and reliable tool for the identification of RKNs and to provide an easy and rapid assessment of a large number of samples by a simple visual evaluation of gels [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%