Proceedings. International Symposium on Technology and Society, 2003. Crime Prevention, Security and Design. 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/istas.2004.1344603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technoism: will the loss of freedom unleash the voice of dissent?

Abstract: Since September 11, 2001, life in the United States was destined to change. While the intentions of the United States Government may be noble in the attempt to protect American citizens, the potential abuse of technological snooping and spying exists and threatens future freedoms and liberties. If citizens are concerned, it seems they have averted any open intellectual discussion. Technology assessment extends a voice questioning the chaotic progression of technology without analysis. It eliminates the role of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we cannot count on technology itself to make the proper judgement and adapt its functionalities to the context it is used in. In other words, citing Davis (2003, in Michael et al, 2008, "technology has no conscience of its own". This does not imply, however, that technology would be a neutral tool, serving as a mere means to reach governmental goals.…”
Section: The Conscience Of Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we cannot count on technology itself to make the proper judgement and adapt its functionalities to the context it is used in. In other words, citing Davis (2003, in Michael et al, 2008, "technology has no conscience of its own". This does not imply, however, that technology would be a neutral tool, serving as a mere means to reach governmental goals.…”
Section: The Conscience Of Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%