2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-020-00817-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technoeconomic analysis of co-hydrothermal carbonization of coal waste and food waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost of manufacturing was determined for Case I following the methodology of Peters et al, 36 and the cost of manufacturing was determined for Case II following Turton et al, 32 as the latter was used by previous literature 29, 37,38 for a similar hydrothermal processing plant. In addition, the various economic parameters used for determining the cost associated with the manufacturing cost estimation can be found in Table 1.…”
Section: Ultimate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of manufacturing was determined for Case I following the methodology of Peters et al, 36 and the cost of manufacturing was determined for Case II following Turton et al, 32 as the latter was used by previous literature 29, 37,38 for a similar hydrothermal processing plant. In addition, the various economic parameters used for determining the cost associated with the manufacturing cost estimation can be found in Table 1.…”
Section: Ultimate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The block diagrams of all four artificial neural network (ANN) models are shown in Figure 4a. The dense, sequential, multilayer perceptron (MLP) architecture was selected for implementation of each of the ANN models in Figure 4b, as it is reported to be a well-established universal approximator [17][18][19]32,33]. Neural networks were deployed to investigate the aforementioned relations and determine the influencing factors related to HHV.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the economic feasibility and social impact of using hydrochar as a fuel source or soil conditioner have not garnered as much attention as the environmental benefits. Only a few authors have investigated the economics of hydrochar for energy generation, mostly focusing on food waste as feedstock [45,46], and in the case of hydrochar produced from pulp and paper mill sludge, no study has been conducted yet, to the knowledge of the authors of this paper.…”
Section: Implementation Of Hydrochar Pellet Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%